• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
BB production team : lazy, arrogant, amateurish, incompetent.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
ubermind
08-07-2002
Originally posted by schwobble


1. They worded the 'task' so poorly that the HMs simply didn't seem to realise that they had a choice to refuse it.


It seems that they didn't word it that poorly if you could figure it out.

2. Then we saw a classic example of weak-teacher bullying against Tim. First, if BB knew (and, face it, BB knows everything) that Tim had hoarded some wine, why not just say so, and tell him to give it back? Why be oblique and patronising, and then up the punishment later - and why, for fkx sake, up that punishment *as soon as* Tim comes in to the DR with a singularly legitimate grievance?

Tim was stupid enough to think he could hide 2 bottles of wine in a house full of cameras. BB gave him a fair chance to give the bottles back, but he chose to play dumb so he deserves getting reprimanded the way he did. He acted like a child and was therefore treated like a child.

3. What the fck were other people's families doing on individual HM's personal message videos?? Are C4 too lazy to edit videotape, or isn't there anyone working there who can do it?

It seems to me that HM's like Jonny were pretty happy to have a glimpse of their family. It only seemed to hurt poor Tim's feelings. Boo-fcking-hoo.

Tim was absolutely right. This BB thinks it's God, and doesn't seem to understand that if there is indeed a God, he wouldn't need to fck people around to make himself look cool and clever.

BB is not acting like God!!! I think you are giving them too much credit. They are trying to act like the house authority. You really should read the book 1984 from which BB gets its name I think you would realise that the whole point of the show is for BB to be in control.
deniiiise
08-07-2002
What I think everyone is forgetting is that the housemates are free to walk at any time it's not a prison, so the producers are playing 'God' so what? They can it's their show!! The housmates are merely participants they need the show, the show doesn't need them.
Storm123
08-07-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by deniiiise
What I think everyone is forgetting is that the housemates are free to walk at any time it's not a prison, so the producers are playing 'God' so what? They can it's their show!! The housmates are merely participants they need the show, the show doesn't need them. ”

completely agree. But I have no respect for any HM that walks. In my book they have failed the challenge that is BB, when they walk before being evicted
Lboogs
08-07-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by Mesostim


Thats a funny thing - I love them as well - But I hate the normal kind. I like to keep them in the fridge to give them a nice brittle feel.

Producers - Arrogant. In How Not to Get Onto Big Brother there weakness to acting lke god was beginning to show. How happy they were to reject people on the basis of jumping over a stick and twenty words. they were lovong it - The power of it all has gobe straight to their heads. They cocked it up anyway and put 10 - 14 wannabes in there.......
”

I agree, I saw loads of people on that show that were better than the HMs chosen. Also I think it was so stupid for the nominations to be based on chance. What is the point? The way the producers have been acting lately does suggest they think they are God or are trying to influence things far too much.

Showing clips of other HMs families makes a mockery of the whole task. What was so special? Everyone got to see their families. What was worse is that the HMs were actually happy with the task, but that was only becasue they have been so deprived of any happiness that anything would keep them happy.
Storm123
08-07-2002
Which task was based on chance?

The basketball was skill.
The darts was skill.
The trivia questions were down to memory.
and the latest one was very clever, as I stated before. The real looser was tim, who didn't have stained piece of paper. And it was what he didn't see, not what he did see.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map