|
||||||||
Queen Vic |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 272
|
Queen Vic
Seeing as the sale to Ian is illegal, the pub still belongs to Chrissie.
What I'd like to know is whether or not The Mitchells buy back the Vic, and when? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 272
|
:-|................................
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,153
|
i want grant peggy and phil behind the bar!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: innit tho'
Posts: 5,642
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kat3000
i want grant peggy and phil behind the bar!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 58
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kat3000
i want grant peggy and phil behind the bar!
Has 'Fill' being sitting too close to the sun-lamp again he is looking a bit scorched |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 55deg49'31.63"N 4deg15'06.87"W
Posts: 3,305
|
In what way is the sale to Ian illegal?
Unless it's proven that she forged Den's signature in signing over his half of it to her. Remember she already legitimately owned half of it. Rudi ™
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 11,996
|
Please no more Mitchells in 'The Vic' I think Jane would be good, Jane and Pat in a partnership.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 24
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackiewalder
Why it's like the Marxs Brothers, she couldn't pull a pint to save her life and who would want to go in a pub and see old 'pudden face' behind the jump
Has 'Fill' being sitting too close to the sun-lamp again he is looking a bit scorched LOL IM NOT THE ONLY ONE WHO DISLIKES PHIL THEN |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Southend, UK
Posts: 457
|
It's an illegal sale because she was using the money to escape the country?
Not to mention she forged Den's signature in the first place, making the pub Sharon's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Super Sussex
Posts: 1,292
|
I don't really want the Mitchells behind the bar. They're kind of annoying. Mind you, at least ol' Peggy's got her family morals in the right place!
Which is more than can be said for TOM KING... Anyhow, back to Easties.... I'd like Pat behind the bar. Or Dot!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cardiff, S.Wales, UK, Aged 15
Posts: 1,821
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatness07
Seeing as the sale to Ian is illegal, the pub still belongs to Chrissie.
What I'd like to know is whether or not The Mitchells buy back the Vic, and when? |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: innit tho'
Posts: 5,642
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philmitchell
No its legally Sharrons. Because A. Chrissie Forged her signature to get the vic. B. Chrissie is now going to prison thefore looses her next of kin right. After her Dennis is next of Kin because he is blood related to Den. However Den might have left a will. Or Dennis might not want it making Sharron the legal owner.
She only forged the signature to gain the second half. So it's not entirely Shazzas. As said in another thread she will probably 'donate' her half as a peace offering. (or something) |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Dublin
Posts: 46
|
I think & hope the Mitchells get the pub!
Peggy :- 'Get outta my pub!' or 'You're Barred!' CLASSIC! C x |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 272
|
That's what I meant - it's Sharons pub, not Chrissies
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 655
|
What more proof is needed apart from the date on the signature will be a date after Den's death.
So technically, half still remains to Chrissie and the other half to Sharon or Chrissie depending on whether Den had a will.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,732
|
I hope half the pub does still belong to chrissie that way she can come back and reclaim it when the mitchells are least suspecting,on peggys birthday perhaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Here in spirit!
Posts: 9,605
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonze
but...but... but.... Den signed over half of the pub to Chrissie before he had a close encounter with the doorstop.
She only forged the signature to gain the second half. So it's not entirely Shazzas. As said in another thread she will probably 'donate' her half as a peace offering. (or something) Legally, the case is a minefield anyway. I can't see Eastie's wanting to spend too much time going into that and would rather move on to the next plot instead. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Wales
Posts: 2,187
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DenWatts
I think that's exactly what will happen - Chrissie will give her half of the pub to Sharon as a small token of apology.
Legally, the case is a minefield anyway. I can't see Eastie's wanting to spend too much time going into that and would rather move on to the next plot instead. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:41.


™