DS Forums

 
 

Eastenders: The Vic and The Mitchells


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 13-11-2005, 18:35
tonygore
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 525

OK so if I got this right, Sharon has now offered the Vic to the Mitchells (even though it isn't yet officially in her name.)But my question is...

How can Phil afford to buy the Vic? I would value the pub at around £750,000 yet I thought Sam lost all their money?
tonygore is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 13-11-2005, 18:36
Kontroversial
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 655
Maybe he has money tied up somewhere? Or maybe we aren't meant to know the answers to these questions because it's soap. Or she could have offered it to him at a knockdown price because it isn't like she needs the money.
Kontroversial is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-11-2005, 18:59
grant.mitchell
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,425
no, dennis firmly said 'it's yours for a fair price', ie don't mess us around on the price.


I think that they should show grant and phil in with the bank manager arranging a loan, that'd be hilarious.
grant.mitchell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-11-2005, 20:24
Bobthechicken
Banned User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,122
More to the point, what makes Sharon think that the Vic belongs to her?
Even if all the legalities had been sorted out in record time surely Vickie would own part of it.
Bobthechicken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-11-2005, 20:27
Hazel
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West Mids
Posts: 600
Originally Posted by Bobthechicken
More to the point, what makes Sharon think that the Vic belongs to her?
Even if all the legalities had been sorted out in record time surely Vickie would own part of it.
Out of sight out of mind? I had forgotten about her!

But then, surely Dennis would be entitled to a share being Den's legitamate son?

Hazel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-11-2005, 20:30
*Cinderflare*
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Hazel
Out of sight out of mind? I had forgotten about her!

But then, surely Dennis would be entitled to a share being Den's legitamate son?

Hes not his legal son though is he? I mean he wasnt married to dennises mother, not even got his name. Im not sure that matters really though.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13-11-2005, 20:31
BumbleSquat
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ireland
Posts: 6,522
Maybe Sharon is classed as Den's second next of kin - Chrissie gave up that title when she shoved a doggy doorstop into his skull?? I don't know, it's best if we don't think of these things...
BumbleSquat is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 13-11-2005, 21:04
SULLA
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Country lad in Yorkshire
Posts: 118,101
People are forgetting that this is Walford where the normal law does not apply
SULLA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-11-2005, 22:17
Tom
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Colchester, Essex
Posts: 320
By the sounds of it, Den would have left the pub to Sharon in his will anyway and no one else would have got a look in. This is what it's probably based on - remember the quote from that episode: 'This pub is for me and my daughter, the only way you'll get me out of here is in a pine box'... got that one right really didn't he!
Tom is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13-11-2005, 22:40
TakeDown247
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Essex UK
Posts: 1,171
I've been thinking how can the mitchells afford The Queen Vic mean I thought they where cleaned out, must of had loads saved in the bank
all I can think off
TakeDown247 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-11-2005, 23:19
Joshy4Micky
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London
Posts: 2,754
Come on now guys this is phil mitchell we're talking about. He can get anything done
Joshy4Micky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-11-2005, 01:17
Bill Fan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lincoln, England
Posts: 1,871
Originally Posted by Bobthechicken
More to the point, what makes Sharon think that the Vic belongs to her?
Even if all the legalities had been sorted out in record time surely Vickie would own part of it.
What happened to Vicky? From what I remember, one minute she was back (with an ENG and not her USA accent thank god) and then she was gone.
Bill Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-11-2005, 01:25
Mitochondria
Banned User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 439
well considering that the Mitchells have lost the Vic 3 times now, they must have splashed out millions over the years getting it back! and if they care soo much about it, why did Phil sell it for £5 to Dan Sullivan?
Mitochondria is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:51.