|
||||||||
Change to XFactor Voting |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 101
|
Change to XFactor Voting
From now on we should vote for the artist that we want to go instead of voting to keep one. My fingers on speed dial for the Conway Shysters.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ireland ♀
Posts: 5,045
|
You should go right ahead and do that fairyliquidizer....you'll put them in the final...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 101
|
not if they change the voting. As it seams easier for people to agree on who they don't want it would be a better voting system if we could vote to eliminate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ireland ♀
Posts: 5,045
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fairyliquidizer
not if they change the voting. As it seams easier for people to agree on who they don't want it would be a better voting system if we could vote to eliminate.
ah you never said you wanted the producers to change the voting...just that we should vote for who we wanted to stay..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Middlesbrough
Posts: 79
|
they wont change the voting, they make more money the way it is
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kataan
Posts: 10,939
|
This was originally intended in the first POP idol. They changed it at the last minite, because apparently Gareth would have gone first if it had been negative voting!.
They have kept it to positive voting in all musical reality shows since. And I think its makes betting scams easier to pull off if its negative voting. ie in a positive vote, you'd have to block vote nearly ALL the other contestants to make someone come bottom two. Block voting only produces results in a betting scam in a positive vote for the actual final, and then there are only two anyway, so it doesnt make any difference. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Near Bradford :D
Posts: 6,269
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Madge
ah you never said you wanted the producers to change the voting...just that we should vote for who we wanted to stay..
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: pimple on the bum of back end
Posts: 18,770
|
I think we just have to accept that the voting will always throw up odd results whether negative or positive voting is used (still a bit bemused as to why Fiona didn't go first on Strictly Come Dancing!) .. on Big Brother quite a few people would like to see the eviction voting changes from negative to positive voting!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 417
|
The votes are not audited by anybody unlike in other phone in votes, please keep your fingers in your pockets and not on the dial buttons. This show is not about public popularity it is something else. Louis "history" with the irish girlies needs to be explained more, I do not think that it was right that artists that have had previous record deals should have been allowed in the show and certainly people with a working conection with a judge is a bit stinky.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ireland ♀
Posts: 5,045
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by *Em*
Think it was pretty self explantaory!!
![]() Yeah it was....but i was having fun!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:48.

