• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
Easternders 14/11
<<
<
5 of 5
>>
>
Lippincote
15-11-2005
Originally Posted by bumpandgrind:
“spoilers suggest that Chrissy will be around in a few weeks time as she has meetings with her solicitor.

It was also mentioned on here aboout 2 months ago that the mitchells would get the pub back - but it wont be as straight forward as it seems - so maybe we havent seen the last of this situation??”

I hope you're right. But I would guess she will be seeing her solicitor to try to get her off the murder charge, rather than in a flash of memory about owning half the Vic.
tinka2
15-11-2005
Originally Posted by Lippincote:
“Absolutely agree, this really aggravates me. Even if there IS a Will, the estate would still have to go through probate and the simplest case takes months. Until it is established who owns the pub after Den's death, it can't be sold.”


And don't even think how sticky probate would get if
Spoiler
one of Den's beneficiaries bites the big one before it's resolved....probably messier still if that beneficiary was also the spouse of one of the others.
Then again, given the death rate in Albert Square, it probably has it's own probate office (in the old video shop maybe) to deal with the convoluted inbred goings on of the locals.
PR.
15-11-2005
Good episode. Two things got me though when Jake is hiding the money under the stairs why can we see the stairs behind him!? And the 2nd is how Little Mo just comes back after walking around the corner of the bar like she hasn't been AWOL for months.
eastenders12
15-11-2005
Originally Posted by PR.:
“Good episode. Two things got me though when Jake is hiding the money under the stairs why can we see the stairs behind him!? And the 2nd is how Little Mo just comes back after walking around the corner of the bar like she hasn't been AWOL for months.”

I think it is a bit silly that little mo was just there like she had been there all along, in the vic, because you would have thought she would have said something like "Where's Chrissie!"
Lippincote
15-11-2005
Originally Posted by tinka2:
“And don't even think how sticky probate would get if
Spoiler
one of Den's beneficiaries bites the big one before it's resolved....probably messier still if that beneficiary was also the spouse of one of the others.
Then again, given the death rate in Albert Square, it probably has it's own probate office (in the old video shop maybe) to deal with the convoluted inbred goings on of the locals.”

lol, good point - I think the probate office might explode if it had to deal with the intricacies of the Watts inheritance
SULLA
15-11-2005
Originally Posted by lala:
“Yeah but with Chrissie in Prison for life, I doubt she will have the power to get it back while inside.”

Going to prison does not mean that any property you own is confiscated.

What makes you think she will have a life sentence. It was never a murder.
eastenders12
15-11-2005
Originally Posted by Lippincote:
“lol, good point - I think the probate office might explode if it had to deal with the intricacies of the Watts inheritance ”

Have you ever thought how Strange the watts family was!
If they were real perople they would be the type you would probably stay away from!

Den was really nasty to angie, then she drank heavily and died! Then there was Sharon, she had been with nearly every man in walford! Then Dennis was a Murderer, Then den come back to life and had another wife who was quite strange, Chrissie, Then she Murdered den and now she is in prison for murder!
SULLA
15-11-2005
Originally Posted by scaryspice:
“Missed last nights episode, can somebody tell me what Tracy said?

Agree about the points raised here with Jane, Id like for her to interact with more stong females.”

Sam apologised to her twice and Tracy, in as few words as possible said that she was busy
Lippincote
15-11-2005
Originally Posted by eastenders12:
“Have you ever thought how Strange the watts family was!
If they were real perople they would be the type you would probably stay away from!

Den was really nasty to angie, then she drank heavily and died! Then there was Sharon, she had been with nearly every man in walford! Then Dennis was a Murderer, Then den come back to life and had another wife who was quite strange, Chrissie, Then she Murdered den and now she is in prison for murder! ”

And don't forget Sharon marrying her nearly-brother Yes they certainly all led very full and interesting lives!
eastenders12
15-11-2005
Originally Posted by Lippincote:
“And don't forget Sharon marrying her nearly-brother Yes they certainly all led very full and interesting lives!”

They have probably had the most storylines in walford dont ya think?
locaputa
15-11-2005
The way characters keep popping out of nowhere is annoying. Where the hell did Maureen come from? Where are Sharon and Dennis living now? WTF? I would like some continuity PLEASE. Juley and Ruby are odd. Naomi looks better and I like her much more now. But I have to ask again, where the hell did 'Lil Mo aka Maureen come from? Why not explain where a character has gone. Maureen wasn't even interacting with her family. And Sharon and Dennis are nowhere to be found, especially with Sam being back in the Vic. ?????????
TWS
15-11-2005
Sharon and Dennis live at the vic, but they are taking a belated honeymoon, not sure how the living arangements will work when they get back. As for Maureen was strange we are to assume i expect that she was with Lynne and got informed about stuff when she came back!


Originally Posted by locaputa:
“The way characters keep popping out of nowhere is annoying. Where the hell did Maureen come from? Where are Sharon and Dennis living now? WTF? I would like some continuity PLEASE. Juley and Ruby are odd. Naomi looks better and I like her much more now. But I have to ask again, where the hell did 'Lil Mo aka Maureen come from? Why not explain where a character has gone. Maureen wasn't even interacting with her family. And Sharon and Dennis are nowhere to be found, especially with Sam being back in the Vic. ?????????”

locaputa
15-11-2005
Originally Posted by TWS:
“Sharon and Dennis live at the vic, but they are taking a belated honeymoon, not sure how the living arangements will work when they get back. As for Maureen was strange we are to assume i expect that she was with Lynne and got informed about stuff when she came back!”

So, Sharon and Dennis are homeless? And Maureen's blank looks and disinterest in her family is just bad writing. Thanks, btw.
hailesy
15-11-2005
So where had Shazza and Dennis disappeared to then?

Where are they now staying?

Where is Billy and where is he staying now?

Good Episode but seemed to be more selective viewing than last week. A patch work of plots that needs tidying up IMO.
Lippincote
15-11-2005
As another poster said, Shaz and Dennis are on 'honeymoon', very conveniently.

Billy is presumably still staying with Pat.
hailesy
15-11-2005
Originally Posted by Lippincote:
“As another poster said, Shaz and Dennis are on 'honeymoon', very conveniently.

Billy is presumably still staying with Pat.”

oh, thanks for the heads up.

I see Peggy and Sam didn't mention once Grant last night - thought they would give him a mention from leaving on Thursday.
Lippincote
15-11-2005
Originally Posted by hailesy:
“oh, thanks for the heads up.

I see Peggy and Sam didn't mention once Grant last night - thought they would give him a mention from leaving on Thursday.”

oh no, Grant is now back in the plot cupboard, they won't mention him till he's due to return! Unless of course Phil has to leave for a few weeks in panto, in which case Grant might get a mention when he 'goes to visit him in Rio'
*Sarah*
15-11-2005
Originally Posted by snowman2500:
“So why copy someone else's post from another website?

Anyone want to see for themselves? -

http://talkwalford.co.uk/ipb/index.p...pic=7921&st=20”

Not only has she been copying TW posts off that person, she has also copied posts off VickyD from TW for the last week or two.
E.g.November 8th
http://talkwalford.co.uk/ipb/index....ndpost&p=164966
http://forum.digitalspy.co.uk/board...39&postcount=45
I am reporting her to the mods. I suggest others do the same.
mitchellbruvva
15-11-2005
Originally Posted by *Sarah*:
“Not only has she been copying TW posts off that person, she has also copied posts off VickyD from TW for the last week or two.
E.g.November 8th
http://talkwalford.co.uk/ipb/index....ndpost&p=164966
http://forum.digitalspy.co.uk/board...39&postcount=45
I am reporting her to the mods. I suggest others do the same.”


its not fair i no the poster on talk walford and thet are annoyed weth her
Keyser Soze
15-11-2005
Originally Posted by *Sarah*:
“Not only has she been copying TW posts off that person, she has also copied posts off VickyD from TW for the last week or two.
E.g.November 8th
http://talkwalford.co.uk/ipb/index....ndpost&p=164966
http://forum.digitalspy.co.uk/board...39&postcount=45
I am reporting her to the mods. I suggest others do the same.”

If she can't come up with her own posts, why on earth does she bother to post at all?
DenWatts
15-11-2005
I can't get either of *Sarah*'s links to work.
gr8
15-11-2005
I wasn't surprised tha Johnny had gone behind Rubys back.

5/10
DensKid
16-11-2005
Originally Posted by Tinalou:
“ I assumed it was Minty, although thinking about it He wouldn't keep his job for long. ”

I tought that it was Kat
<<
<
5 of 5
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map