If they were to put someone back in then they wouldn't necessarily have to bar them from winning. Each of the evictees has already lost a public vote once so wouldn't stand much chance of winning anyway.

if a housemate were put into the house, they would automatically be exempt from nomination, eviction or winning. The reason behind this is because they have been systematically nominated by the housemates and voted to leave by the public who had paid for the privilige. They would simply be a stand-alone entity in the house, being taken in and taken out at a later date

A

Don't agree with this. I dont think any evicted HM put back in should win because its unfair on those who spent money voting, but I think Alison or Spencer could have a good chance.

Alison may well liven up the house which at times can be very dull - she was not voted out by an overwhelming majority after all and many say it was engineered anyway. Spencer was also not voted out by an overwheming majority and it was said at the time that if he had been up against anyone else but Alex he would have stayed. Sinc