• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Alex and Tim UP FOR NOMINATION
<<
<
5 of 5
>>
>
Deerd
16-07-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by Al the Cynic
Vote Alex out: keep Tim in!!!!
That's called Tactics: no more no less.

Tim has no chance of winning, absolutely zero.
Alex might still spoil Kate's chances.
From the responses on another thread it looks to me like Kate has a LOT to gain from him not being there in the final week.

I'm not a Kate fan particularly but I detest that Jonny creature. Alex's moping has finished him for me.


kate winning brings an added bonus: I bet Caveman Jonny will be really pissed to be beaten by a woman: beating women is man's work after all.


Vote Alex out

Then

Vot Kate to win!!!
”

*agree with the tactics

*don't agree on jonny

*please take the advise of LK further up thread and use smilies at the sarccy/ironic bits. some of the above (last line) was sarrcy, wasn't it??? - not hyper-critical honest

Deerd
kate to win
LyndaH
16-07-2002
JMO but I wonder if it was tactical in the way of this.

Tim has stated loudly and clearly over last few days he wants out hence everyone voting for him BUT they all know Jade is not particularly liked outside from previous occasions. Soooooo

If they put Tim up against Jade as he wanted (and in a way I am sure them) there is a risk he would remain in the house. If however they put him up against Alex who has survived previous nominations against ppl who were very popular there (in there eyes) is no way of him staying.

They can't really say that in the diary room however so wont see it on there. Just my thoughts on it.

I will state now I am not anti-Jade and like Alex,Johny and Kate will admit to not liking Tim very much at all
babspanky
16-07-2002
[quote]Originally posted by LadyKnight
[b]

Welcome babspanky - little tip. Try to use smileys. A lot of people miss both irony and sarcasm and the only way of showing it is the smiley things.

A lot of people don't understand either ... but that's a different subject entirely!!!

LK - being helpful [
Thanks!
Al the Cynic
16-07-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by Deerd


*agree with the tactics

*don't agree on jonny

*please take the advise of LK further up thread and use smilies at the sarccy/ironic bits. some of the above (last line) was sarrcy, wasn't it??? - not hyper-critical honest

Deerd
kate to win
”

I panic as I reply to a post by Deerd as I wonder ... can his/her keyboard stand another bashing.

By last line I was not sure what you meant. About Jonny being vile, no, I meant it, he is. His attitude to women is patently clear: the theme in his jokes / humor has one common thread: his dominance over pathetic women. If he acted like that within the fire service he would be sacked (unless it remains institutionaly sexist).


By voting for Kate: I meant that . Get Alex out now and I reckon Alex supporters will turn on Jonny the cheeky king of the common man.
A_different_Bob
16-07-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by Al the Cynic


I panic as I reply to a post by Deerd as I wonder ... can his/her keyboard stand another bashing.

By last line I was not sure what you meant. About Jonny being vile, no, I meant it, he is. His attitude to women is patently clear: the theme in his jokes / humor has one common thread: his dominance over pathetic women. If he acted like that within the fire service he would be sacked (unless it remains institutionaly sexist).


By voting for Kate: I meant that . Get Alex out now and I reckon Alex supporters will turn on Jonny the cheeky king of the common man.
”

His best friend in the house is female. Is Kate pathetic, I think not, fairly wordly wise id suggest.
Going steady with whatsername for 8 years.
Question for you. Why not the same criticism of PJ's antics or Tim's crass racist and sexist jokes?
Just wondering!

Bob
Ready for a cuppa
nelly-j
16-07-2002
i thought there had been lots of criticisms of pj and tim racist and sexist jokes etc. perhaps you missed them?
Bilberry
16-07-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by buttercup
What are they gonna fill the gap with when Davina wants to check out Tims 'best bits'? ”

Obvious, innit? The best bit is when the prat leaves the house - so they'll just show his Walk of Shame a 2nd time
A_different_Bob
16-07-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by nelly-j
i thought there had been lots of criticisms of pj and tim racist and sexist jokes etc. perhaps you missed them?
”

The question was directed at Al the Cynic. Her criticism of Jonny is particularly vitriolic (check other threads) and OTT.
Al the Cynic
16-07-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by A_different_Bob

His best friend in the house is female.
Ready for a cuppa
”

At first sight that seems like hard evidence.
Think along the lines of "is a female who willingly takes part in all his male-dominance rituals". Who finds being manhandled, chased with a belt and even cooperates in what could easily be interpreted by a court as an indecent assault.

His closes ally in the house is a female: no way would I dispute that. But I would not take it as any evidence that he has not got a hundred years of civilisation to catch up on ;o)



PJ is history.

Tim is irrelavent: a small bit part.
A_different_Bob
16-07-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by Al the Cynic


At first sight that seems like hard evidence.
Think along the lines of "is a female who willingly takes part in all his male-dominance rituals". Who finds being manhandled, chased with a belt and even cooperates in what could easily be interpreted by a court as an indecent assault.

His closes ally in the house is a female: no way would I dispute that. But I would not take it as any evidence that he has not got a hundred years of civilisation to catch up on ;o)



PJ is history.

Tim is irrelavent: a small bit part.
”

'Male dominance rituals'. Ive heard it all now. Perhaps youve read too many Andrea Dworkin books.
As ive said before, if you thought it was a case of indecent assault, report your witnessing it to the police. ITS YOUR DUTY!
saneblack
16-07-2002
The highlights on channel 4 tonight 16/07 was blatantly anti Alex. They can't stand the fact that they are losing control of the show (Alex threatening to walk out with Tim) so now they are setting him up for a horrendous fall.

Brett the psychologist has been trying to persuade Alex to stay in the house while the editors have been busy using any footage they could find that would show Alex in a bad light.

I think the best thing now would be for Alex to walk out of the house and cause as much chaos as possible. That way he would leave on his own terms and not be booed by the public who have been swayed by bias highlights on channel 4.
magsiesss
16-07-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by saneblack
The highlights on channel 4 tonight 16/07 was blatantly anti Alex. They can't stand the fact that they are losing control of the show (Alex threatening to walk out with Tim) so now they are setting him up for a horrendous fall.
”

But at approximately 22:45 (when DS reporter was listening to Kate) ... an interesting snippet was to be heard in a discussion between Alex and Tim.

Alex has said to Tim he would possibly stay - Tim advised him to go for it.

I reckon Alex is returning to himself.
Al the Cynic
16-07-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by A_different_Bob


'Male dominance rituals'. Ive heard it all now. Perhaps youve read too many Andrea Dworkin books.
As ive said before, if you thought it was a case of indecent assault, report your witnessing it to the police. ITS YOUR DUTY!
”

You ought to learn to read first ...


Is this "harmless" little stunt really that innocuous?

If this had happened at work (say during a weekend conference) where a female colleague was forcibly stripped in front of an audience ...

Would the fire service endorse his behaviour?
Is it the actions of an adult?



It is actually possible to have fun without being a complete clown: jonny acts like he is trapped at puberty.

Tim admittedly did tell a lie: he said he was not implying Jonny acts like a d*ckhead. But he does Tim, that is the whole point ;o)
MelBB1
16-07-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by saneblack
The highlights on channel 4 tonight 16/07 was blatantly anti Alex. They can't stand the fact that they are losing control of the show (Alex threatening to walk out with Tim) so now they are setting him up for a horrendous fall.

Brett the psychologist has been trying to persuade Alex to stay in the house while the editors have been busy using any footage they could find that would show Alex in a bad light.

I think the best thing now would be for Alex to walk out of the house and cause as much chaos as possible. That way he would leave on his own terms and not be booed by the public who have been swayed by bias highlights on channel 4.
”

No way should he leave. I want to see Alex evicted and face the same music as ADELEEEEEEEEE!
CAZZA
17-07-2002
[quote]Originally posted by Tess
[b]
Quote:
“Originally posted by CAZZA
Iam so glad that Alexhas been nominated. He is such a b*tch. There is nothing worse than a man who acts like a girl.


Cazza: Would you please explain to me why 'real' men don't like women.
”

Sorry I have not replied sooner (end of working day etc). I did not quite understand what you meant and also why I, in particular should know the answer to your question?
zillion
17-07-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by kmac
None of the housemates see Jade as a threat, which is a mistake....remember Survivor 1 and Charlottes victory. I'm not saying Jade will win but even 2nd place is still a far larger victory than she deserves. ”

Good summary! I have a bad feeling about this ....
<<
<
5 of 5
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map