• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Woah....I mean seriously. Woah.
<<
<
5 of 5
>>
>
Chiaroscuro
05-12-2005
Originally Posted by GlenP:
“ BT (or whoever supplies them)”

My gripe is with them then.
retired pre-am
05-12-2005
As I have said before, a part of this show is to provide money for C.I.N. The vehicle the BBC have used to produce that money is a DANCE COMP (of sorts). If all that is wanted is to raise money for children in need by voting for your favourite celebs, why not just have a show each week where the cameras have spent a day in the life of <name of celeb>.... then show highlights of each celeb on a Saturday and let the public spend their money voting for their favourite personality?

As it happens, I do not think the current form of losing a person every week is the best way of making money for CIN. Sure, there will be some people who, having lost their favourite, will vote for someone else, but I bet there are a lot of people not phoning up now because their favourite has left the show.

First and foremeost, this is a DANCE show, therefore the voting should be restricted to who performs best on the night, or who has collectively performed best over all the dances. Even CRH said on ITT tonight that he hopes the public do not turn it into another personality show.
PeachUK
06-12-2005
Originally Posted by musicangel:
“Maybe it should be like the x factor, and the viewers vote on bottom two, then the judges kick the worst dancers off!!!???”

Don't hit me for knowing this... but this Saturday the judges DIDN'T decide and it went completely on the public vote (on the X-Factor).
FYI: I saw the Sunday morning repeat show - not the Sat night one
Geeny
06-12-2005
Patsy and Anton did themselves proud their last dance the best and great attitudes nothing false or bigheaded. Thank God for ITT Anton will still be around for xmas Im sure
luckyforest
06-12-2005
Originally Posted by itsnotcricket:
“ But on the Zoe and Ian issue. If they really were the weakest performers, what are our judges looking at? They did criticise them a bit this week but they still awarded them the 2nd highest sets of marks and still appear to be under their spell.”

And that's why the viewers disagreed with the judges.
<<
<
5 of 5
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map