• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Does Anyone Know Who Nominated Who Yet??
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
l_mac
16-07-2002
Quote:
“What was Kate's reason? (in New York, and no web feed, so the forum + live updates is all I have... sob!)”

She said he took things too seriously and also that she related to him least out of the remaining housemates (she had already nominated Tim) Fair enough reasons, IMO. Whether we like him or not (and I don't) Kate loves Jonny, he's her favourite. No way she'd nominate him. Although she and Jade have had their differences, each are aware of the others' faults and yet have found a way to get on well together. And Jade is the only other girl, if she left Kate would have no-one to do the "girlie" things with. If I were Kate, Tim and Alex would have been my choices. I don't know why everyone was so suprised.
Eusebius
17-07-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by MelBB1
Alex is a liar and a bore to boot and Kate has stuck it to him bugtime! How stupid he must feel after flirting with her all week! LMAO at his efforts. Kate is one smart chick. ALEX OUT !!! Please go away now as you are even more boring than Tim and Alex put together Zzzzzzzzzzz. ”

You have not attempted to justify your use of the expression "two-faced bitching" in your first post with a logical argument. I take that as admission of defeat. Hence your descent into dismissive invective. Your last sentence merely displays your own childishness and lack of debating ability.

And to your friend (or alter-ego?) LondonCalling: no, my original post was not bitchy. My alluding to MelBB1's poor English language skills is based on the fact that she has used words and expressions which are incoherent within the context of what she describes. My conclusion that she is using buzzwords like "two-faced" and "bitching" randomly for vitriolic effect is a fair one. It cannot be regarded as gratuitous abuse. Unlike you and MelBB1, I am able to substantiate and argue my points with logical analysis of evidence.
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map