The resident BB Psychologist Dr Sandra Scott was on RI:SE this morning, painting a less than desirable picture of Kate in that she DOES "attach herself" to who she *perceives* to be the most "popular housemate" at any given time (use and abuse..). and then to abandon them when there is another shift in popularity. She argued that Kate "used Alex for her own end to gain
increased security in the house", and it did not surprise her at all the way Kate & Jonny voted (reverting back to their original "alliance").

She was painting the picture of Kate being *desperate* to win the £70.000 and the fame that goes with it and would use anyone and everyone to get her hands on the prize. She's learned well from Jonny, I just wonder if the public are going to catch on to Kate's deceit and class her as the "two faced bitch" that others have been classed with.

Its about time that proper analysis of both Kate and Jonny was made by the in-house psychologists. I am pleased with what Dr Sandra Scott said about Kate, and it was perfectly valid in that she has (from week one) attached herself to almost all of the males of the house in order to satisfy her own lust for fame.

Sandy: “Well Kate, you use your flirtatiousness to manipulate the boys….”

Kate: “What does manipulative mean, no really, I don’t know what man-ip-u-la-tive [queue: gormless look learned from drama school] means?”

Kate and Jonny are the two main wannabe’s of this series, and if the public do anything at all, it should be let anyone else but them win this show!

Errrrr. ......excuse me for pointing out the painfully obvious but the object of the exercise is to be the last (wo)man standing in the house and walking off with £70k.
Bearing that in mind, what is deceitful about "using someone for increased security of the house" ? The difference between HMs is who is better at playing the game.

Poor old Doc Sandra seems to have developed a wee crush on Alex and all her objectivity has flown out of the window. It's great fun to watch and I hope we see more of her over the next week. She will be a usefull tool for the pro Alex lobby against the opposing propaganda of Moyles and maybe Norton. Shame then that she will lose so much credibility.

I thought Sandra Scott's analysis of Kate's reaction to the nomination results wasn't entirely correct...I thought she looked honestly shocked when she realised that Jade wasn't up for eviction. Perhaps she betted on the other three opting to evict Jade?

Either way, Kates face was a picture when she realised Jade would be with her until almost the very end of BB...

It's about time the psychologists wised up to Kate manipulative behaviour.

Seems to me Wooster's got a wee crush on Kate and can't see through her manipulative ways

Dr Sandra Scott who has difficulty speaking normally, is simply jealous of Kate and she wants Alex to win for sure! Whatever happened to impartiality? She has previously said negative things about Alison, Jade, Sophie and now Kate. Funny how she was glowing with admiration for Adele (the week Adele was up for eviction) and she was frantically telling us that Adele and Alex's relationship was genuine whilst saying Spencer and Kate's was not! Well we shall see what happens when this is all over. She also said it would be better for Jade to go that week for her own good! Talk about anything to keep Alex happy. Even when the RI:SE host was making fun of how Tim cried she had to butt in and say that actually it wasn't anything like that etc. DR Sandra Scott is an Alex fanatic and she will say anything to discredit those who have a real chance of beating him. IGNORE the silly woman from now on as she talks out of her AR$E

You really didn't understand my post did you? Never mind.

As for crushes, let's just say girls don't really do it for me.

Seems to me that Kate would have voted for Jade if she wanted Jade out. It was pretty clear who Jonny and Kate were going to vote out during the week.

If she did expect Jade to be nominated then the only reason she didn't vote for her was because she didn't want Jade to see her nomination when she was evicted. (which still makes her a manipulative b*tch)

[quote]Originally posted by Tracy

Hmmmm yes we must all take in account what a pop psychologist on RISE??? (least watched programme in the world!! ok bit of exaggeration) says!!!!!!!!

Ooops! I've been laughing at Tracy's post so much I hit the submit key!

Tracy, you big storyteller!...lol
I watched RISE this morning too - I think the views you just posted about Kate's are actually your views. It's the way YOU picture it. Are you that desperate?

You do realise that your two conclusions are totally contradictory ??

Oops jumped the gun on that one. Sometimes I skim its a bad habit. Must be a low atention span from watching too much TV.

Dr. scott has seemed to be "following the masses" and agreeing with the tabloids at every opportunity. I would be ashamed of myself if I were her. She has not said a single statement which holds any iota of truth throughout the series. Kate never liked Alex becasue of the way he treated her in the beginning - HE made several advances on her all of which she avoided.

Kate had a laugh with Alex when he attempted to act in the "pantomime" manner which Kate obviously enjoys - but soon realised that wasn't going to win him any favours with Kate and promptly went back to his old whingeing self which prompted Kate to vote for him previously and now again...

Nooo, it makes her a very clever girl, playing the game....you do remember it's a game?
Kate deserves to win!

Holy crap, Big Brother is a game

I always thought that it was a controlled psychological experiment.

So when Kate backstabs its clever but when Adele does it it's bitchy??

IMO Alex should win because he isn't playing some stupid game he's just being himself. The rest are acting like a bunch of Arses.

Mel, the way it works on this formum as far as Alex's campaigners' are concerned, if any of the psychologist speak negatively of Alex - well, they're talking rubbish!...........When they speak negatively about other hm's........it's Gospel!

[b]


Kate isnt playing a game per se, she is there to have fun and perhaps win 70k, its nothing like adeles calculated effort
kate has never tried to influence anyone, ever
did you hear alex yesterday actually telling tim who he voted for!!!!!!!!!

ROFLMAO!

She had to nominate SOMEBODY, how's that backstabing, eh?
you should respect her decision, even if it doesn't suit you.

Hear them yesterday!?...lol Alex and Tim, they do it all the time!
but some people on here have 'selective' hearing, it seems

Yes because the difference is Kate is clean and attractive and Adele is.....................NOT!

Umm then why vote for Alex and mope in the bedroom after the nominations were revealed?

Anyway it was a total tactical vote, which is fair enough. I just don't know why she's trying to make it look like she didn't vote for Alex when its blatantly obvious to all in the house who vote for who.

[b]



Her moping is not, i think, to pretend she didnt vote for alex, but its more to do with the general feeling in the house. Refer to her chat with johnny about how sad alex is, and how they should make the house fun for him if he stays............unfortunately she had to vote for someone and it was alex and tim that are bringing the mood of the house down in her opinion