IMHO a lot of these threads seem to be a complete waste of time.
All the Dareen fans say how worthy a winner Darren was etc. etc.
All the Colin fans say that he should have won and was a better dancer.
All the Zoe fans say that she only lost because the judges were biased towards her and this lost the public vote.
They will all defend their favourites to the death and will NEVER listen to any reasonable logical argument. that is what fans (short for fanatics) do.
Just look at football fans. Most are seriously loyal and will defend their team to the end. Same with SCD fans. Most have their favourites (which is perfectly ok) and will vote for them to the end.
So don't waste your time trying to argue your favourites cause on any of the negative or pointless threads that have been created
e.g.
"First time the wrong dancer won..." (Yes if you are a Colin or Zoe fan and No if you support Darren)
"Did anyone else think Zoes samba was overated..." (Yes if you are a Colin/Darren fan and No if you support Zoe)
"So who was the best dancer" (Darren fans will say Darren, Colin fans will say Colin and Zoe fans will say Zoe)
you will be wasting your time. your not going to change anyones mind. Arguing on a forum is pointless. No one wins!
Also criticising the judges is pointless. Do you not think they were playing a role exactly as the judges do on X factor etc. If they just said nice things all the time it would be boring so they play the pantomime baddy. When they speak everybody hisses..... Everybody has their favourites and that probably applies to the judges as well. They had a job to ensure that the 3 best dancers got to the final. That they achieved and then the public got their say on the winner.
Darren won and that's that. He might not have been the best dancer OR he might have been on the night. It doesn't matter he won the public vote and that decides the winner of SCD. I personally thought he was much better on the night than I expected.
Now I know Colin and Zoe fans will argue that their favourite was a better dancer. AND they might be right over the course of the series (and acording to the judges on the final).
But it doesn't really matter. It wasn't a life or death situation and it wasn't professionally marked. It was a bit of fun that raised 1.5 million for Children in Need and gave us all an awful lot of enjoyment.
So mellow out and talk positively about the dances, not negatively and talk about the enjoyment you got and lets leave the negative comments behind us.
All the Dareen fans say how worthy a winner Darren was etc. etc.
All the Colin fans say that he should have won and was a better dancer.
All the Zoe fans say that she only lost because the judges were biased towards her and this lost the public vote.
They will all defend their favourites to the death and will NEVER listen to any reasonable logical argument. that is what fans (short for fanatics) do.
Just look at football fans. Most are seriously loyal and will defend their team to the end. Same with SCD fans. Most have their favourites (which is perfectly ok) and will vote for them to the end.
So don't waste your time trying to argue your favourites cause on any of the negative or pointless threads that have been created
e.g.
"First time the wrong dancer won..." (Yes if you are a Colin or Zoe fan and No if you support Darren)
"Did anyone else think Zoes samba was overated..." (Yes if you are a Colin/Darren fan and No if you support Zoe)
"So who was the best dancer" (Darren fans will say Darren, Colin fans will say Colin and Zoe fans will say Zoe)
you will be wasting your time. your not going to change anyones mind. Arguing on a forum is pointless. No one wins!
Also criticising the judges is pointless. Do you not think they were playing a role exactly as the judges do on X factor etc. If they just said nice things all the time it would be boring so they play the pantomime baddy. When they speak everybody hisses..... Everybody has their favourites and that probably applies to the judges as well. They had a job to ensure that the 3 best dancers got to the final. That they achieved and then the public got their say on the winner.
Darren won and that's that. He might not have been the best dancer OR he might have been on the night. It doesn't matter he won the public vote and that decides the winner of SCD. I personally thought he was much better on the night than I expected.
Now I know Colin and Zoe fans will argue that their favourite was a better dancer. AND they might be right over the course of the series (and acording to the judges on the final).
But it doesn't really matter. It wasn't a life or death situation and it wasn't professionally marked. It was a bit of fun that raised 1.5 million for Children in Need and gave us all an awful lot of enjoyment.
So mellow out and talk positively about the dances, not negatively and talk about the enjoyment you got and lets leave the negative comments behind us.




I adore Brendan when he's not taking himself so seriously!
)
, and it sounds funny to say it, but it meant that I could actually sit back and enjoy it more than if someone I really wanted to win was there (I know not everyone feels this way).