Originally Posted by mrfreeview:
“So far you have tried to belittle me through two theads”
No, you completely misunderstood a humourous post that no one else had trouble with, and in your desire to be pompous and unpleasant stalked me across another forum and made stupid comments about a simple question I asked.
Quote:
“To date you have announced that you were a student of electronics, then perhaps not.”
If you:
1) Have the sense of humour bypass reversed
2) Take comprehension lessons
You will see I never announced any such thing. I merely stated that Electronics PhD studenets had to do something in their spare time. No one else took it as a serious assertion that I'd been an electronics student.
Quote:
“Then you stated you undertook stage lighting only to later change your mind”
I did not change my mind. I did stage lighting. End of story.
Quote:
“I was always of the understanding that the object of a forum like DS was to help one another.”
And yet you seem to be using it to be a pompous prig and score points?
Quote:
“Again another inconsistency!
Can I suggest that YOU should read and then think very carefully about what you are going to say in a thread and then take care in how you compose a response.”
I didn't understand something about some wiring so I asked a question which was swiftly and consisely answered by another poster.
You seem to have a major problem with that. Why?
Quote:
“And if you don't understand, perhaps because your out of your depth, say nothing.”
So, no one can gain enlightenment here since if we doin't understand, we cannot speak. I suggest you seek quality psychiatric help at the earliet opportunity.
Quote:
“Put bluntly, if you were verbally mouthing off, your lips under the sewing machine 'blanket stitch' would seem to be, on a number of occassions, most appropriate.”
FFS, I asked a question. What the hell is your problem?
Quote:
“Out of curiosity (because the installation seemed very old and not all that well done, checked the wiring in the BT master box).
And as you have earlier stated you are not a telephone engineer so how can you possibly pass judgement on the standard of an installtion?”
If you can't understand the difference between checking to make sure nothing has been pulled loose/put under strain/eaten, and certifying the correct connections have been made, you are a pretty poor engineer.
Quote:
“Yes you don't actually have to or need to understand what you are doing with the instructions that are produced. You have clearly demonstrated this by installing an extension without knowing how many wires are need to provide a connection to an exchange.”
Again, I don't know what your problem is here. I followed the instructions and correctly installed the extension. They are designed to be installed by people who know nothing about telecom circuitry.
Quote:
“The instructions are provided so that most people can manage this type of work.”
Well done. You've got it.
Quote:
“The problem usually comes later when the installation goes defective. This is usually because of poor installation standards and then a lack of logical faulting technique. When you don't know what your doing even 3 wires never mind 4,5 or 6 can seem complicated!”
Again, you seem confused about the difference between knowing the function of each wire, and the ability to do point to point wiring.
If the installation 'goes defective', then the only possible remedial action that can be taken with this type of extension is to ensure the moulded plug is still plugged in at one end, and that the three screwed connections are still intact at the other. Other than that, you've got a break in the cable of inside the cable/plug interface.