• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Did Chantelle actually audition for BB6?
<<
<
2 of 4
>>
>
Veri
06-01-2006
Originally Posted by Alrightmate:
“In fact they reported that the agency in question said that they were glad that Endemol had given Chantelle her big break.”

So? I'm glad they did too.
Veri
06-01-2006
Let's make this explicit.

Nothing in the article says that C4's claim that "Chantelle auditioned for Big Brother 6 as a normal contestant" is false.

It doesn't even say it. Indeed, everything it does say is consistent with C4's claim. That's before we even consider the question of whether we want to believe the obnoxious tabloid in question.
moogester
06-01-2006
Originally Posted by Veri:
“Let's make this explicit.

Nothing in the article says that C4's claim that "Chantelle auditioned for Big Brother 6 as a normal contestant" is false.

It doesn't even say it. Indeed, everything it does say is consistent with C4's claim. That's before we even consider the question of whether we want to believe the obnoxious tabloid in question.”

I read the article as if they were trawling for a lookalike and Chantelle just happened to fit the bill.

Quote:
“Jez Lee said: "Endemol contacted us because they were looking for people who could impersonate celebrities. We sent an email out to all our lookalikes.”

Having looked a the agency's website, I'm not surprised they chose Chantelle, if that is what happened, the rest of them are rubbish
Veri
06-01-2006
Originally Posted by moogester:
“I read the article as if they were trawling for a lookalike and Chantelle just happened to fit the bill.”

The article says they were "looking for people who could impersonate celebrities" -- as in carry off the sort of deception Chantelle is now engaged in -- not necessarily a lookalike, and not to pick them becuase they were a lookalike.

But the article only suggests (without ever saying it) that she was found via the agency. Nothing in the article says she couldn't have auditioned in the normal way.
Opaque
06-01-2006
They could have contacted angencies to get them to prod their members into turning up for the auditions. That would be allowed after all.
Alrightmate
06-01-2006
Originally Posted by Veri:
“So? I'm glad they did too.”

What do you mean by 'so?'

You've just simply split what I said in two and completely changed the context.

'So' nothing.

You were agreeing with a poster about the evening standard making out that she was famous.....I only said that they didn't say anything of the sort and higlighted this point by pointing out that they said that she was 'given a break'.

'Lets make this explict'
You like Chantelle so much that you are just desperately reacting to anything anybody says to do with Chantelle because you aren't reading what people are actually saying, aren't you?

One poster implied that Chantelle was already a celebrity, and you are just blind to the fact that other people are saying something completely diferent and making more of a point about Chantelle possibly being the hired help.

You are not reading what Moogster posted, and you aren't reading what I've posted.
From your "So? I'm glad they did" reply it appears that you are just unecessarily defending Chantelle on instinct and gut reaction because you like her so much.
You're defending her on what you think people have said as opposed to what people were actually talking about.

I think your replies in the thread have been a bit misguided because you are misunderstanding what has been said because you're not reading and are just blindly defending.
Alrightmate
06-01-2006
Originally Posted by Veri:
“The article says they were "looking for people who could impersonate celebrities" -- as in carry off the sort of deception Chantelle is now engaged in -- not necessarily a lookalike, and not to pick them becuase they were a lookalike.

But the article only suggests (without ever saying it) that she was found via the agency. Nothing in the article says she couldn't have auditioned in the normal way.”

That's a nice coincidence isn't it?

She is found via the agency due to Endemol asking for somebody like her,....but she also just by chance happened to be applying to be on Big Brother.

Imagine how they all laughed when they realised the irony of this hilarious coincidence.


There's nothing to stop them putting somebody they've already hired through the auditions just for the sake of procedure and make everything look more honest than it might actually be.
It would be a piece of piss to fast-track somebody through the audition process.
IWantEugesBaby
06-01-2006
She was in the same dry run as Eugene.... I knew I recognised her when I saw her, then I realised I had a picture of her at the last night party, which all the "spare" parts attended.

So as far as I know, no fast track or anything, she just didn't quite scrape in last time.

Steve
SWW (SWW)
06-01-2006
Originally Posted by IWantEugesBaby:
“She was in the same dry run as Eugene.... I knew I recognised her when I saw her, then I realised I had a picture of her at the last night party, which all the "spare" parts attended.

So as far as I know, no fast track or anything, she just didn't quite scrape in last time.

Steve”

Cheers for the solid info IWEG, good to "see" you still around.

Hows Eugene doing?


Rgeards
IWantEugesBaby
06-01-2006
Originally Posted by SWW (SWW):
“Cheers for the solid info IWEG, good to "see" you still around.

Hows Eugene doing?


Rgeards ”

Eugene's doing ok..... suddenly everyone wants to talk to him for his opinion on CBB4 (which, to be honest, I don't really think he has!)

Nice to "see" you too lol
Alrightmate
06-01-2006
Originally Posted by IWantEugesBaby:
“She was in the same dry run as Eugene.... I knew I recognised her when I saw her, then I realised I had a picture of her at the last night party, which all the "spare" parts attended.

So as far as I know, no fast track or anything, she just didn't quite scrape in last time.

Steve”

That doesn't mean she wasn't fast-tracked through auditions at all.
How is what you say proof that she wasn't?

The idea of having her fast-tracked through auditons would be to make it look authentic, and for other housemates to have met her at auditions would be the whole point so it all looks plausible.
beanbean
06-01-2006
i think she would have been great on bb6, shame she didnt make it
lulu g
06-01-2006
Originally Posted by Veri:
“... Chantelle is different from the other housemates in the House. And that's because she's never presented a TV show, never had a hit record and she certainly hasn't won any seats in Parliament. ...”

Chantelle is not the only HM that could be described in those terms.
floyd666uk
06-01-2006
Originally Posted by moogester:
“Does anyone remember the furore when it was discovered an agency had billed Endemol for Makosi? Just to refresh your memories this is from a DS news article at the time:

Makosi actress claims denied

Well it looks as if they've been at it again with Chantelle . This is from tonight's London Evening Standard”

Well they should bring back hanging fro this shouldn't they?

Very serious!
IWantEugesBaby
07-01-2006
Originally Posted by Alrightmate:
“That doesn't mean she wasn't fast-tracked through auditions at all.
How is what you say proof that she wasn't?

The idea of having her fast-tracked through auditons would be to make it look authentic, and for other housemates to have met her at auditions would be the whole point so it all looks plausible.”

I said "as far as I know"!

The audition process isn't that long, after the first one, there weren't lots and lots of stages for Eugene.

The main one really was the dry run! So the people who fast tracked were those who didn't take part in either one.
GREATGUY
07-01-2006
why would bb fast track anyone through to the dry run? surely if they thourght she was so great they would have put her in the house.
it makes perfect sense that when they came up with the concept for celeb bb 4 and needed a non celeb they would think of someone who they thourght was good in the dry run and we know she was in that.
tellyguy
07-01-2006
the one who saw her at BB6 final night. I *know* she was a dry-runner for BB6. Endemol do *not* need to HIRE these people! they spend their entire year begging to be on the show...and this particular girl, as they TOLD us, was in the BB6 audition process. How transparent does it have to be? Big Brother are taking the piss out of celebrity itself, they are waving a flag saying "we devalued celebrity!" by putting just the kind of person who spends their life trying to be on reality TV, in ther with the "real" "celebs".
brazzur
07-01-2006
did Davina say she was a promotions model who'd worked as a look-a-like when she was going INTO the house?
bad1609
07-01-2006
Nope... no comments like that or about her Paris Hilton work...
thenetworkbabe
07-01-2006
Originally Posted by Alrightmate:
“Yes I agree with you. The issue isn't whether she has a level of celebrity or not, the issue is whether she was hired or not.

And like you imply, it becomes apparent that Chantelle's agency wasn't approached to hire somebody for this Celebrity Big Brother.....no, the agency appears to have been contacted with a view to hiring somebody for the normal BB that was shown last summer...which is even worse.

Way back during BB3 some of us suggested that Endemol were hiring people for BB due to nearly all of the contestants working in the media, holding equity cards, and even a couple of them having appeared as extras on mainstream television drama shows like 'Casualty' and 'The Bill'.”

its not an issue now. As there is no prize money I presume she is getting paid - which makes hiring her appropriate? She didn't get into BB6 which means that she wasn't an improper HM there either. The only criteria for her to be there now is not being a celebrity and her being a celebrity impersonator logically adds to the joke as she impersonates a celebity. we could have a celebrity impersonator winning for pretending to be a celebrity - which is actually a good joke on celebrities.

The general issue is complicated as many people who would have the urge to go on BB would belong to the entertainment fringes or be drama students or the like. Where would you draw the line - school play, third body in Casualty, model, drama student, back-end of a pantomine horse? The problem surely is if they pick people to act certain roles rather than people who fit them - was Kemal acting throughout? Was Makosi?
thenetworkbabe
07-01-2006
Originally Posted by GREATGUY:
“why would bb fast track anyone through to the dry run? surely if they thourght she was so great they would have put her in the house.
it makes perfect sense that when they came up with the concept for celeb bb 4 and needed a non celeb they would think of someone who they thourght was good in the dry run and we know she was in that.”


She is far too normal though to fit in with the BB6 concept. They wanted rows and unlikeable people. She wouldn't fit. for a house of celebs though she is fine in a way a Shell or a Lesley or an Emma or a Saskia wouldn't be.
itsnotcricket
07-01-2006
Originally Posted by lulu g:
“Chantelle is not the only HM that could be described in those terms.”

And in what way does Faria Alam qualify as a celebrity? She is simply somebody who was in the news for having affairs with two prominent men. Her own job was as a PA which doesn't sound like the career of a celebrity. Also, until this show I hadn't heard of her for ages, not since the scandals died down, in fact.
Alrightmate
07-01-2006
Originally Posted by thenetworkbabe:
“its not an issue now. As there is no prize money I presume she is getting paid - which makes hiring her appropriate? She didn't get into BB6 which means that she wasn't an improper HM there either. The only criteria for her to be there now is not being a celebrity and her being a celebrity impersonator logically adds to the joke as she impersonates a celebity. we could have a celebrity impersonator winning for pretending to be a celebrity - which is actually a good joke on celebrities.

The general issue is complicated as many people who would have the urge to go on BB would belong to the entertainment fringes or be drama students or the like. Where would you draw the line - school play, third body in Casualty, model, drama student, back-end of a pantomine horse? The problem surely is if they pick people to act certain roles rather than people who fit them - was Kemal acting throughout? Was Makosi?”

What do you mean it's not an issue? Oh because you decide it isn't an issue?
If somebody has something to discuss then it still is an issue, it's not for you to decide when a discussion ends.

Whatever I've posted is in relation to the subject of the thread......the article in 'The Evening Standard' that reports that Chantelle's agency was contacted by Endemol who were apparently looking for a celebrity impersonator.

That's nothing to do with getting paid expenses, it's all about being hired from an agency.

And you are somebody else who is confusing what was said. The original post wasn't about Chantelle being a celebrity, it was about her possibly being the hired help who came straight from an agency....that's the difference.

It can get a bit annoying when people respond with points to answer you about an argument that is nothing to do with me or the thread.
It feels like sometimes people just get what they think is the jist of a thread and just answer instinctively without really thinking about who said what, and then deviating away from what the original post was actually about.
I never made a point about Chantelle being a celebrity in the first place, and neither did Moogster.
GREATGUY
07-01-2006
Originally Posted by thenetworkbabe:
“She is far too normal though to fit in with the BB6 concept. They wanted rows and unlikeable people. She wouldn't fit. for a house of celebs though she is fine in a way a Shell or a Lesley or an Emma or a Saskia wouldn't be.”


we know for a fact she got to the final 30 or so to be on bb6 though.
thenetworkbabe
07-01-2006
Originally Posted by Alrightmate:
“Whatever I've posted is in relation to the subject of the thread......the article in 'The Evening Standard' that reports that Chantelle's agency was contacted by Endemol who were apparently looking for a celebrity impersonator.

That's nothing to do with getting paid expenses, it's all about being hired from an agency.

And you are somebody else who is confusing what was said. The original post wasn't about Chantelle being a celebrity, it was about her possibly being the hired help who came straight from an agency....that's the difference.”


Don't see the problem - they wanted someone to go into celeb BB. They knew about her from BB6 and had her agency address to contact her - or they went to the agencies looking for impersonators - or some combination of the two. The bottom line is I presume she is being paid to do the job? She can't be there only being paid expenses as a normal HM if there is no prize money on offer - she must be getting something -which means she is hired just like the celebs are - i suspect she is a lot cheaper.

The question would be important if she was hired as hired help for Bb6 - but she wasn't. The issue there is still Makosi and its a toss up there whether they went out and asked agencies for someone who fitted a role or got some actress to play a role they had written. Is Makosi there because they wanted a black girl with a positive job who had a big personality or was she there playing the role they wrote for her. As Bb6 seems not to have much plot beyond being set up for continous conflict its impossible to tell from the result - though I think she was that batty in real life.
<<
<
2 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map