• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Did Chantelle actually audition for BB6?
<<
<
4 of 4
>>
>
floyd666uk
07-01-2006
Originally Posted by lulu g:
“One thing I noticed last night while rewatching Chantelle's initial visit to the DR is that there was absolutely no sign or shock, surprise, or hesitation on her part. Each time BB paused in his explanation of her situation, she just said 'Right' or 'OK', quite casually and unhesitatingly. Whatever was going on, she was in on it.”

Oh here we go yet more conspiracy theories.

Yawn yawn yaaaaaaaaawwwwwn.


Some pf you have far too much time on your hands.

:yawn:
lulu g
07-01-2006
Originally Posted by floyd666uk:
“Oh here we go yet more conspiracy theories.

Yawn yawn yaaaaaaaaawwwwwn.


Some pf you have far too much time on your hands.

:yawn:”

It probably took me no more time to type out my post than it took you to type yours.
tellyguy
07-01-2006
god this is absolutely hilarious...why do you not understand that the ONLY people who apply for big brother are fame-seekers, wannabees, etc...who naturally have agents, have been on other shows, etc. etc. - WHY would Endemol & C4 pay for these people when they throw themselves at them for free? I know a great deal about what goes on inside BB and you are getting so wide of the mark it's unbelieveable. You are seeing dark deeds, conspiracies to defraud and legions of genius lawyers where they just don't exist.
Villa
08-01-2006
Originally Posted by lulu g:
“One thing I noticed last night while rewatching Chantelle's initial visit to the DR is that there was absolutely no sign or shock, surprise, or hesitation on her part. Each time BB paused in his explanation of her situation, she just said 'Right' or 'OK', quite casually and unhesitatingly. Whatever was going on, she was in on it.”

She seemed pretty shocked when BB told her she couldn't impersonate any celebrity didn't she
Veri
08-01-2006
Originally Posted by Alrightmate:
“
Originally Posted by thenetworkbabe:
“I think their lawyers are very clever - they don't tell you lies - its just how you interpret what they say. ”

.....Tell me about it
There's been many a time I've seen a cleverly worded response by an Endemol spokesperson.

I'm sure they've been very selective in what they've said regarding Chantelle. ”

I wouldn't go so far as to say the tabloids don't tell lies, but they are also cleverly written.

The cited article about Chantelle tried to give the impression that she was recruited via an agency, but it didn't actually say that.
Veri
08-01-2006
Originally Posted by Alrightmate:
“
Originally Posted by Veri:
“...
So if word goes out to agents that Endemol is looking for housemates, and that leads to clients of those agents showing up for BB auditions, is that really do different from what happens now?

Turning BB into a scripted show with actors cast for parts seems a different and much greater step.
[Note that I mean actors playing roles rather than being ordinar housemayes.] [b] It's also something that could be done with auditions of the sort that BB's already been using. So the two changes (getting HMs from agents, scripting the show) are significantly independent.”

I don't think that the idea that they will literally hire real actors and give them stories to act out is a that much of a greater step at all,...and I don't think it's that different either.

Because your first paragraph that I've highlighted explains why the situation you describe in the second paragraph I've highlighted is entirely possible.”

The big step is moving to a scripted show.

I don't think it's a very big step (and I think we're agreeing about this part) to start using agents in the quest for housemates. Nor is it a very big step to start having actors for housemates. So far, BB seems to get housemates who've made some kind of stab at a music career rather than at acting, but I don't think anything stops actors from auditioning. (Perhaps Mary was already an actress of some sort? I don't remember.)

Quote:
“In fact I'd say that what you describe about housemates being supplied by agents means that this is a whisker away from actually happening in reality.”

I don't see how it takes BB much closer to using scripts.

There isn't a tight connection between using agents and having scripts. For instance, the agents might not supply actors. They might just supply the same sort of people who now go into BB. Or -- looking at it from the other side -- they could use scripts with housemates obtained in the traditional way, without involving agents. (Maybe there'd be some kind of union issue? I'm not sure what, if anything, has to happen before someone's allowed to function as an actor on tv.)

Quote:
“If you have two things going on;
1)Where BB want certain characters to fulfil certain roles, and they would like certain things to happen in the house...
2) And agents are approaching actors on their books to turn up to auditions,....

Quote:
“So if word goes out to agents that Endemol is looking for housemates, and that leads to clients of those agents showing up for BB auditions, is that really do different from what happens now?”

that's the whole point, what you posted here is the very reason why they could get away with hiring actors and the whole thing being a pseudo soap opera where actors are paid to act out situations”

There's still a big difference between wanting "certain characters to fulfil certain roles" and "certain things to happen in the house" and telling housemates to take on those characters and to make those things happen.
Quote:
“Of course it isn't that different from what's happening now, that's the point...it's a steady drip drip effect, it doesn't happen overnight.

Look at BB6 and compare it to the very first BB...now there is more of a difference isn't there?
It's a gradual change thing that happens over time.
Over time the viewers get softened up as they are presented with changes each year over time, and are more willing to be open to accept things that they wouldn't have in previous years.

It's already been going in that direction for a while, so it doesn't take a genius to see what the next stage is in the evolvement.”

What is the relevant gradual change? So far as I know, the producers have always wanted "certain characters to fulfil certain roles" and "certain things to happen in the house". Perhaps in BB1 things were less definite, but from Dean's book and other things it sounds like the idea of characters, story lines, etc was alreaady there in BB2. So it's a constant, rather than a change.

I can imagine some gradual steps. For example, from suggesting courses of action to ordinary housemates to having some housemates who were actors in cahoots with the producers, to increasingly more scripted parts for the actors, to more of the housemates being such actors, ...

But I don't think BB has gone very far along such a path.
Veri
08-01-2006
Originally Posted by Alrightmate:
“...
But I think the show takes a dramatic swing to fictional soap opera drama if they are starting to literally hire people from agencies. That's a very fine step away to literally employing actors.

The thing here is that I believe many people ... would actually accept it all as reality, and get as emotional at fake scenarios acted out by the characters as they would if it was real....and would phone in to vote too.

That might sound ridiculous and extreme, but over the past couple of years it feels like it's edging ever closer to it actually being possible to pull that off in a year or two.”

It's interesting to think about.

If Endemol did this, and people knew, I don't think they'd have to accept it as reality in order to get emotional or to phone in and vote.

I don't know whether they would accept it as reality to not, but it would not be absurd for people to get emotional about fake, acted scenarios (people already get emotional about what happens in fictional films and plays - even in novels); nor would it be all that odd for people to phone in and vote if they saw it as a way to influence which way the story went.
Alrightmate
28-01-2006
Bumped thread up because duplicate threads are being created.

Maybe the threads can be merged.
<<
<
4 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map