Quote:
“Originally posted by Alrightmate
Yes, I didn't post as naively as you think,and there isn't anything wrong in your replies.
It's simply concern that BB may become really pointless and predictable to watch in the future. If all contestants gave their personality a makeover and removed the rough edges, it would be impossible to support any of them.
<big snips>
I know this post may be a tad serious, but I was just left feeling unemotional this year. ”
I do agree with you, I've said so (maybe not on here?) since the beginning. I too think that BB4 will be even more farcical. It is a forlorn hope that C4 will make many changes to the good. If anything they will accentuate those activites that we see as negative and I fear it will make the program even more popular with a bored public.
Next year I would like to see....
A more diverse age range, one person over 40 with the rest 20 somethings is not a good enough mix for me.
More purpose to the HMs nine weeks stay instead of the HMs merely trying to waste the days away because there is not much else to do.
More honest programming with less interference from the editing team and an hour long (at least) highlights program. The present 20 mins cannot in anyway accurately represent the preceding 24 hours.
Far stricter(er SP?) discipline of ALL HMs. There seemed to be strikes for rather petty reasons and none for seemingly serious breaches of the rules, namely covert(ish) nomination chats and blatant attempts to influence nominations.
Absolutely NO outside messages, videos or phone calls. It's only nine weeks fer goodness sakes not nine months. If a HM can't go without hearing from loved ones or hearing football results or whatever then should not be there.
No multiple voting should be allowed either as those than can afford it are at an advantage to those who can't.
The house should be more remote from the Public to stop anything being shouted over the fence. That had a Major influence on more than one occasion.
The HMs should really earn there weekly money, just as most of us have to. They might appreciate it more and spend it more wisely. The divide was a good idea but the tasks to decide who went where were way to petty. The divide also stayed up long after it's purpose had expired.
I could go on but, I doubt much, if any, will happen next year. I think we'll see an ever younger, sillier, more drunken and vain group. That seems to be what C4 'think' we want to see.