• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Chris Moyles can't afford Jade!!
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
Bunter
29-07-2002
He had to settle for Jonny and Kate because they were free.
CHUTNEY
29-07-2002
Jade would have needed subtitles for 95% of the listeners.....not easy on radio!

Apparently she's being paid half a million for her story by News International..........what a sad world we live in.
Mark H
29-07-2002
No-one else in the series wanted a fee, so why should two losers (Alex and Jade) require one?
cazkins
29-07-2002
Shouldn't that read 2 runners up?
Caz
Mark H
29-07-2002
Same thing. They didn't win.

Runner Up=Loser
Bunter
29-07-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by Marko Hutchio
No-one else in the series wanted a fee, so why should two losers (Alex and Jade) require one? ”

probably because they are getting money thrown at them from all angles.
Mark H
29-07-2002
Looks like it's gone to their head then. This time next year, they'll be like everyone else who's been on BB. Nobodies.
cazkins
29-07-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by Marko Hutchio
Same thing. They didn't win.

Runner Up=Loser
”

Loser=someone who doesn't even try.
Runner up= someone who came very close to winning
Loser=person that can't handle intelligent, polite debate.
Point made?
Caz
without_reason
29-07-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by Marko Hutchio
Looks like it's gone to their head then. This time next year, they'll be like everyone else who's been on BB. Nobodies. ”

All the more reason to make as much money as fast as possible - if I was in their position (and I am very glad I am not) then I would want to be earning as much money from as few appearances as possible. Their agents are obviously thinking like this.

They don't do this for our good you know they do it because they want to get rich and famous - they haven't got a cat in hells chance of being much more than Z-list celebs so they should be seeking to maximze the money - and what is wrong with that
Supernova
29-07-2002
We all know that Alex was the real winner of Big Brother.
Bunter
29-07-2002
I can't believe some peoples' logic.

I suppose Jade should have done NOTW for free so Murdoch can f**k her over and have an extension on his yacht, and then she can live in a council flat in SE1 for the rest of her life.

Mart - Ma Rule
29-07-2002
I'll accept Alex as the real winner only if he recieved 2 million more votes last Friday!
Mark H
29-07-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by SuperNova
We all know that Alex was the real winner of Big Brother. ”

No. We all know that Kate is the real winner. Alex finished 3rd.

If Alex was the real winner, he would have picked up 70 grand on friday night, but he didn't.
bilijojimbob
29-07-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by Marko Hutchio
Looks like it's gone to their head then. This time next year, they'll be like everyone else who's been on BB. Nobodies. ”


Yep, your right there... only you forgot one thing... Nobodies with a few bucks more than they had already. So good luck to them. If the bigwigs are daft enought to pay them and we are daft enough to read about them, and post comments on boards like this. Then the question now is "who ARE the chipsticks"?
bilijojimbob
29-07-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by Bunter


probably because they are getting money thrown at them from all angles.
”

C,mon folks be really honest with ourselves here, given the oppertunity, I think most would milk it for what its worth...
we WILL buy the junk and read the stories, otherwise whats the point in forums like this
Tracy
29-07-2002
I think alot of why Alex and Jade werent on radio 1 is because they have signed deals with the papers Jade is getting paid 500,000 from the Murdoch group so I imagine they have complete rights to her for that money.

And Alex is signed to the Express and OK mag they tried to get Jade for 300,000 so I imagine Alex got just as much for signing for them. plus other deals in the pipeline.

I dont blame then for milking as much money as they can frorm the papers after all they were milking them when they were in the house.

http://media.guardian.co.uk/presspub...765052,00.html
johnno
29-07-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by Tracy

I dont blame then for milking as much money as they can frorm the papers after all they were milking them when they were in the house.
”

well said!!!! and let's not forget that Big Brother/C4 have also made MASSIVE profits from them and they came out of the house effectively with £0, now they are getting their payback for 7 weeks in a lunatic asylum from the media who profited from them too.
markie
29-07-2002
The excerable Jonnykate (or is that Katejonny... it kind of blurs together...) having "won" the event now need to milk their 15 mins of fame...

The wonderful Alex and the magnificent Jade "lost" the event... and the 70,000 pounds that go with it.... shame, but I'm sure the six-figure media offers, plus 7-figure advertising contracts will ease their pain. Just shows what a personality is worth, compared to a catchphrase or two, Yes? Or should that be "Yeeessss"...

Given the amount of needle, especially between Jade and Kate, I would imagine that there are smug grins in Essex and Bermondsey right now, whilst the gormless twosome are crying into their black tower and blackcurrent lucosade punch!

Poor Kate, poor Jonny. Pair of has-beens before they even woz.
JoJo4
30-07-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by cazkins


Loser=someone who doesn't even try.
Runner up= someone who came very close to winning
Loser=person that can't handle intelligent, polite debate.
Point made?
Caz
”

Loser - entered but didn't come all that close to winning - in fact, never stood a chance!! Maybe another plastic award is in order for having the grace to take part
Tracy
30-07-2002
It just proves that the papers think that Alex and Jade were the real characters in the house, and that people will be interested to read about them. They don't throw that kind of money around, if they can't see it boosting their circulation figures.
chuff
30-07-2002
If I remember correctly, it was a competition as to who would get the most votes by the general public, not who may make the most money.
ontwofronts
30-07-2002
Chuff, you are wasting your time, this is another thread where you witness logic fly out the window and enter the land of spite, distortion and general pettiness.
There seem to be alot of people unable to accept that alex / jade / the chickens lost out to kate in fridays vote. Suddenly a new set of rules is adopted; the vote didn't matter, its who gets the biggest paper deal, who gets the largest cheque for an endorsement. These people are sad. When people "debate" their favourite movie star you don't hear "it must be Cruise cos he got $20 million for MI2 and Willis didn't get half that for his last movie". This is getting like a forum for boyband discussion "I like Westlife best cos they're the fittest and wear the best clothes".
Its pathetic. For the last month Jonny and Kate get bashed for being "Wannabes" and now its over apparantly its about who will get the best post BB career, the Alex / Jade faction have turned into wanna-them-to-bes!
Grow up, the real winner was Kate, she got the most votes. The best thing about democracy is that the majority decide. The majority held a different view to you and whilst you are entitled to your opinion, I am equally entitled to point out the folly or POPPYcock held in it. And as for the result being an example of social decay in the UK today, please stop it. Don't you realise how incredibly small minded and arrogant you sound. As though supporting Alex is a sign of an evolutionary step or an indicator of higher social observance.
You sound like a-level students after a couple of shandys entering into a "putting the world right" debate whilst not yet having a clue about how the world operates.
Mothers, put them all to bed.
Last edited by ontwofronts : 30-07-2002 at 03:51
Henrik
30-07-2002
/\ Fantastic post
Bunter
30-07-2002
To compare movie stars with BB contestants is crap.
Jade and Alex are whoring themselves in Hollywood Blockbusters.
Jonny and Kate are waiting for Woody Allen to cast them in his next film and they will do it for free.

The bottom line is Kate and Jonny have zero personality,so noone wants them.
That's good enough for me,I still hate seeing that lemon Craig on the telly sawing bits of four by two.
BristolSimon
30-07-2002
There is clearly a Mike Tyson effect here.

Tyson continues/continued to be able to demand huge money for fighting even though his best days as a boxer had long since passed.

This is not because people liked him, but because people were fascinated by his life and his personality.

Given Jade's pugilistic tendencies the analogy seems quite apt!
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map