Hi,
Having looked at some other PVR threads, lately the Humax and Panasonic, I am now looking at the topfield but find a lot of traffic is diverted away from DS onto another thriving forum. The Topfield boasts quit a high specification when compared to PVRs from Pace and Panasonic.
Can people contribute to (or even supply a list if they have it on file computer) of the bugs or 'features' as at the latest December '05 software? I am interested to know about all of them because I found the majoritys interpretation of a small issue may be a big one for those in the minority
The similarities between the Humax and the Topfield are intreaguing yet the Topfield is differentiated from the UK freeview PVRs in a major way by ability to change to different software (TAPs) for a set of functions or ease of use. If it is possible for TAPs to present a different set of bugs can they be left off the list; as an average (boring :yawn: ) consumer I dont think I will tinker with firmware and such like
Having looked at some other PVR threads, lately the Humax and Panasonic, I am now looking at the topfield but find a lot of traffic is diverted away from DS onto another thriving forum. The Topfield boasts quit a high specification when compared to PVRs from Pace and Panasonic.
Can people contribute to (or even supply a list if they have it on file computer) of the bugs or 'features' as at the latest December '05 software? I am interested to know about all of them because I found the majoritys interpretation of a small issue may be a big one for those in the minority
The similarities between the Humax and the Topfield are intreaguing yet the Topfield is differentiated from the UK freeview PVRs in a major way by ability to change to different software (TAPs) for a set of functions or ease of use. If it is possible for TAPs to present a different set of bugs can they be left off the list; as an average (boring :yawn: ) consumer I dont think I will tinker with firmware and such like



