Quote:
“Originally posted by Chris Green
What actually concerns me more is the nature of the punishment, which I saw suggested in one paper was to be a £30 fixed penalty, like a parking fine.
No points on your licence, so, as per bloody usual, the well off will continue to flaunt the regulations and just pay up, whilst the poor will have to stop doing it.
If it was a "points" offence, at least the penalty would be meaningful to both rich and poor alike. Here endeth the sermon on communism! ”
“Originally posted by Chris Green
What actually concerns me more is the nature of the punishment, which I saw suggested in one paper was to be a £30 fixed penalty, like a parking fine.
No points on your licence, so, as per bloody usual, the well off will continue to flaunt the regulations and just pay up, whilst the poor will have to stop doing it.
If it was a "points" offence, at least the penalty would be meaningful to both rich and poor alike. Here endeth the sermon on communism! ”
There is the option to fine the company they work for as well, although if the guy is a high level manager\director they won't have any problem paying the fine.
Although I agree with the ban on hand held phones there still no mention of all those other users who are using two way radios in there vehicles while they are on there own. They are holding a conversation regardless of the nature of the call but it look like it the poor hapless motorist who will end up bearing the weight this law.
ebbing



