• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Doctor Who
Results:What is your opinion on the spinoffs?
I'm looking forward to both series
45 (33.83%)
I'm looking forward to Torchwood
65 (48.87%)
I'm looking forward to the K9 spinoff
5 (3.76%)
I'm not interested in either spinoff
18 (13.53%)
Voters: 133. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in?
Doctor Who: The spinoff programmes
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
Black Guardian
09-03-2006
Originally Posted by NeilGreen:
“And that really spoiled your viewing pleasure that much? If it's a Consciousness (which suggests less of a reliance on body), why can it not adopt different forms?



Did you watch the episode? The Emperor Dalek had gone mad after his fall through time and had created Daleks 'in his own image' from different stock to 'original' Daleks. It was a sign of his madness that he wanted to be worshipped rather than just lead.



So? The look of the Cybermen has changed and evolved several times over the course of 40+ years of Doctor Who. Plus the new lot are from a parallel reality.



Actually, I think it's a reflection of one of the themes from 'Series 1', i.e. consequences of the Doctor's lifestyle to himself and other people. If it's handled and written sensibly, I have no doubt it will make a good episode. It's not as if if new Who has become the continuity-ridden monstrosity that McCoy and McGann had to deal with.



I think you'll find that a lot of people believe that there are many points in Series 1 which stand on their own two feet and don't relate back to past Who.



Is this a complaint about the farting or something more deep-rooted about AoL/WW3? As for Boomtown, it's quite clear that there was a whole different tone and dynamic to that story, which was certainly not a case of more of the same.”

My dislike of the Slitheen is well documented on the forums so I am not going to bore everyone with it all over again.

The scripts for AOL/WW3 were rather juvenile in comparison to others in the series. Boomtown did redress the balance as it had far more depth, less emphasis of the farting gags and a sterling performance by Annette Badland.

Series one had a lot of strength but equally it was weak and flawed in places. Nothing is ever perfect and you can only please some of your audience some of the time..otherwise we would be viewing it through rose tinted glasses.

We can only hope that when they came to plan series two they took a constructive look back at what worked and what didn't and used that knowledge to strength it even more. Some of the early signs we are seeing are encouraging with the casting of fine actors Maureen Lipman, Roger Lloyd Pack, Tracy Ann Oberman et al and returning faces Liz Sladen, Zoe Wanamaker etc...

We also have a fine pedigree of writers and directors this series two so all bodes well.

I think a lot of people are feeling uneasy at the inclusion of people like Trisha, Derek Accorah etc even if they are only cameos..it reminds them of the unhappy 80's when the series used far too many lightweight 'names'.

The proof of the pudding is always in the tasting so whilst I have my reservations I am trying to keep an open mind but I refuse to don those rose tinted spectacles when it comes to an honest appraisal of each episode I watch.
DenWatts
10-03-2006
Originally Posted by Black Guardian:
“My dislike of the Slitheen is well documented on the forums so I am not going to bore everyone with it all over again.

The scripts for AOL/WW3 were rather juvenile in comparison to others in the series. Boomtown did redress the balance as it had far more depth, less emphasis of the farting gags and a sterling performance by Annette Badland.

Series one had a lot of strength but equally it was weak and flawed in places. Nothing is ever perfect and you can only please some of your audience some of the time..otherwise we would be viewing it through rose tinted glasses.

We can only hope that when they came to plan series two they took a constructive look back at what worked and what didn't and used that knowledge to strength it even more. Some of the early signs we are seeing are encouraging with the casting of fine actors Maureen Lipman, Roger Lloyd Pack, Tracy Ann Oberman et al and returning faces Liz Sladen, Zoe Wanamaker etc...

We also have a fine pedigree of writers and directors this series two so all bodes well.

I think a lot of people are feeling uneasy at the inclusion of people like Trisha, Derek Accorah etc even if they are only cameos..it reminds them of the unhappy 80's when the series used far too many lightweight 'names'.

The proof of the pudding is always in the tasting so whilst I have my reservations I am trying to keep an open mind but I refuse to don those rose tinted spectacles when it comes to an honest appraisal of each episode I watch. ”

Nicely put, BG - and you saved me a lot of typing.
Black Guardian
10-03-2006
Originally Posted by DenWatts:
“Nicely put, BG - and you saved me a lot of typing.”

thank you Mr Watts!
The_Master
10-03-2006
Yes I agree with the Black Guardian really, nicely put indeed.
I am looking forward to season 2, believe it or not, but I do hope the writers pay attention to the flaws in series 1.
It isn't an easy series to write for as everone has an opinion on it even if its just as mundane as who should have the lead role.
David Tennant looks very promising, I just hope the scripts don't let him down. I hope there are fewer overly emotional aliens.
By the Way, I don't even don the rose tinted glasses for Jon Pertwee or Tom Baker episodes (which are generally my favourites) as many of those, especially Tom's, are also flawed but good television nevertheless.
Black Guardian
10-03-2006
Originally Posted by The_Master:
“Yes I agree with the Black Guardian really, nicely put indeed.
I am looking forward to season 2, believe it or not, but I do hope the writers pay attention to the flaws in series 1.
It isn't an easy series to write for as everone has an opinion on it even if its just as mundane as who should have the lead role.
David Tennant looks very promising, I just hope the scripts don't let him down. I hope there are fewer overly emotional aliens.

By the Way, I don't even don the rose tinted glasses for Jon Pertwee or Tom Baker episodes (which are generally my favourites) as many of those, especially Tom's, are also flawed but good television nevertheless.”

I don't have a problem with emotional scenes as it keeps it real. The scene between The Doctor and Jabe when she tells him she knows who he is and the one with Rose telling Jackie that she had met her father really stood out and were quite powerful.

If you can't emotionally identify with certain characters and perhaps what they are going through then you can't really believe in them as people or aliens for that matter.
The_Master
10-03-2006
Quote:
“If you can't emotionally identify with certain characters and perhaps what they are going through then you can't really believe in them as people or aliens for that matter.”

Agreed. My gripe is that I think there was a bit too much of it and that it was overplayed at times.
Black Guardian
10-03-2006
Originally Posted by The_Master:
“Agreed. My gripe is that I think there was a bit too much of it and that it was overplayed at times.”

Did you have anyone or any particular scene in mind?

My gripe is and always will be Jackie and Mickey...though I concede Jackie was much better in TCI.
The_Master
10-03-2006
I agree with you about Jackie and Mickey, and yes she was better in TCI, Mickey was not.
I thought "Rose" worked well as an introductory episode, and showed great promise of what was to follow.
I still think the Dalek in "Dalek" would have been better suited to being Davros, whether it was mad or not.
The Slitheen in "Boomtown" was also another upset alien, and although done very effectively I just think there were too many of these sentimental scenes in series one.
There are more scenes and characters I could mention, but I must admit I haven't watched them since last year. What I am talking about is my overall perception of series one, and that is that there was too much sentimentality and soap. If there had been less "soap" with Rose et al, then the emotional aliens may not have been so much of a problem for me.
Black Guardian
10-03-2006
Originally Posted by The_Master:
“I agree with you about Jackie and Mickey, and yes she was better in TCI, Mickey was not.
I thought "Rose" worked well as an introductory episode, and showed great promise of what was to follow.
I still think the Dalek in "Dalek" would have been better suited to being Davros, whether it was mad or not.
The Slitheen in "Boomtown" was also another upset alien, and although done very effectively I just think there were too many of these sentimental scenes in series one.
There are more scenes and characters I could mention, but I must admit I haven't watched them since last year. What I am talking about is my overall perception of series one, and that is that there was too much sentimentality and soap. If there had been less "soap" with Rose et al, then the emotional aliens may not have been so much of a problem for me.”

I found Boomtown a far more satisfying story in that it explored not just Margaret's predicament but also The Doctor's in that he had to face up to the responsibility of his actions.

Not fond of the soap element either but it has worked to a degree in that it anchors Rose to Earth and shows how her travels and experiences impact on others and just the person who is travelling in the TARDIS. Just think the actors overplayed the 'council estate' stereotype a bit too much to the point it was painful to watch.

Thankfully Jackie was much better in TCI but Mickey is best used for what he was intended....a table leg or something equally wooden!

Have to say Noel is amazing in Kidulthood and it is brilliantly written.
NeilGreen
10-03-2006
Originally Posted by Black Guardian:
“I found Boomtown a far more satisfying story in that it explored not just Margaret's predicament but also The Doctor's in that he had to face up to the responsibility of his actions.”

Absolutely agree, BG. Interestingly enough, it took a second viewing for me to really enjoy the emotional depth of this ep, as it (somehow) failed to click with me on the first viewing.

Quote:
“Not fond of the soap element either but it has worked to a degree in that it anchors Rose to Earth and shows how her travels and experiences impact on others and just the person who is travelling in the TARDIS. J”

For me, one of the successes of new Who is that characters, whether human or alien are (generally) quite rounded and believable, which engages me beyond and above the drama, conflict and danger of stories.
Black Guardian
10-03-2006
Originally Posted by NeilGreen:
“Absolutely agree, BG. Interestingly enough, it took a second viewing for me to really enjoy the emotional depth of this ep, as it (somehow) failed to click with me on the first viewing.



For me, one of the successes of new Who is that characters, whether human or alien are (generally) quite rounded and believable, which engages me beyond and above the drama, conflict and danger of stories.”

As I mentioned before scenes like the one with Jabe and The Doctor, Rose with Pete Tyler, Rose with Jackie when she told her about meeting her father and a few more I could mention did work. There were some nice touching moments in series one I agree but equally there were some that were utterly contrived. I never really bought into the fact that someone like Rose would have such a wet blanket of boyfriend as Mickey either. She is strong and feisty. Not suggesting she would go out with a city type but I would imagine her with someone with a bit of 'umph' in them!
Salford_Who
11-03-2006
Originally Posted by Black Guardian:
“As I mentioned before scenes like the one with Jabe and The Doctor, Rose with Pete Tyler, Rose with Jackie when she told her about meeting her father and a few more I could mention did work. There were some nice touching moments in series one I agree but equally there were some that were utterly contrived. I never really bought into the fact that someone like Rose would have such a wet blanket of boyfriend as Mickey either. She is strong and feisty. Not suggesting she would go out with a city type but I would imagine her with someone with a bit of 'umph' in them! ”

The script book (or is it the annual) explains that Mickey is Rose's safety net, and that she did have a relationship with someone a little bit more exciting (and more like the doctor)
Black Guardian
11-03-2006
Originally Posted by Salford_Who:
“The script book (or is it the annual) explains that Mickey is Rose's safety net, and that she did have a relationship with someone a little bit more exciting (and more like the doctor)”

Surely that makes Mickey even more of a doormat and doesn't reflect well on Rose...he will do until someone better comes along!
Salford_Who
11-03-2006
Originally Posted by Black Guardian:
“Surely that makes Mickey even more of a doormat and doesn't reflect well on Rose...he will do until someone better comes along!”

Or he will do until someone more dangerous comes along...
Black Guardian
11-03-2006
Originally Posted by Salford_Who:
“Or he will do until someone more dangerous comes along... ”

Perhaps that will be her undoing..
DenWatts
20-03-2006
Originally Posted by Salford_Who:
“The script book (or is it the annual) explains that Mickey is Rose's safety net, and that she did have a relationship with someone a little bit more exciting (and more like the doctor)”

Maybe this person will make a reappearance in her life during series two, possibly causing Rose to rethink her desire to travel with the Doctor?
Black Guardian
20-03-2006
Originally Posted by DenWatts:
“Maybe this person will make a reappearance in her life during series two, possibly causing Rose to rethink her desire to travel with the Doctor?”

What has Rose been missing or lacking all her life and she has been longing for?

Her father!
DenWatts
20-03-2006
Originally Posted by Black Guardian:
“What has Rose been missing or lacking all her life and she has been longing for?

Her father!”

True!

Spoiler
And he will be reappearing several times in the second series...
Black Guardian
20-03-2006
Originally Posted by DenWatts:
“True!

Spoiler
And he will be reappearing several times in the second series...
”

And when it comes to her father Rose always goes to pieces..as demontrated when talking to Jackie inside the TARDIS in POTW.
DenWatts
21-03-2006
Originally Posted by Black Guardian:
“And when it comes to her father Rose always goes to pieces..as demontrated when talking to Jackie inside the TARDIS in POTW.”

I'm predicting an "Orange Wednesday" moment very soon.
Black Guardian
21-03-2006
Originally Posted by DenWatts:
“I'm predicting an "Orange Wednesday" moment very soon.”

Two for the price of one?
DenWatts
21-03-2006
Originally Posted by Black Guardian:
“Two for the price of one? ”

Are we back to discussing David Tennant again?
Black Guardian
21-03-2006
Originally Posted by DenWatts:
“Are we back to discussing David Tennant again? ”

So what did you mean by an orange Wednesday then?
DenWatts
21-03-2006
Originally Posted by Black Guardian:
“So what did you mean by an orange Wednesday then?”

You're right - I thought someone was going to put two and two together, join the dots, leap out of their bath and run yelling down the street...

Erm, maybe not that last one.
Black Guardian
21-03-2006
Originally Posted by DenWatts:
“You're right - I thought someone was going to put two and two together, join the dots, leap out of their bath and run yelling down the street...

Erm, maybe not that last one. ”

i thought you meant two for the price of one
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map