• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Doctor Who
Cyberman = Borg, any other Dr Who things pinched by Trek?
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
The_Master
15-05-2006
Originally Posted by Gutted Girl:
“First season TNG episode The Neutral Zone, when Deanna is trying to track down any living relatives of the woman that had been defrosted, the names of the actors that had played The Doctor up until that point were listed as decendents.”


Thankyou, it's been a while since I saw it.
highlander
15-05-2006
Replicators Vs Borg anyone ?
Alrightmate
15-05-2006
Originally Posted by salochin:
“i think you took me to literally, my original post perhaps wasnt as clear as it should have been. I certainly wasnt suggesting that the trek writters had actually just lifted the idea of the cyberman and turned it to the borg. I hgappen to be a bigger trek fan than a who one, the two are different and trek is far superior-especially seasons 3-5 of TNG.

My point was rather that the cybermen and the borg havce quite strong resembalances, and were there any others.

Realistically there are only so many plot devices (cop shows for instance only have a out 20- everything else is a rehash to some extent)

As someone else has pointed out the mechanical taking over the organic is as old as science fiction itself, teleoprts date back from the earliest sci fi as well.

whilst i am sure some who fans think it can do no wrong, most are a realistic bunch and realsie its limitations.

There are far better written, produced, acted sci fi out there (TNG, BSG etc). Myself I like who but almost as light entertainment. Its a rare example of a british show of any genre thats done well and has some decent production values. I certainly think that there are better Sci Fi shows and I am sure Dr Who has borrowed as much as any other show. Very little can be completly original-even if it is "copied" completly accidentaly”

Well it's been discussed on here before, and I myself am not saying that they definitely did lift the idea of the Borg from the Cybermen,...but I definitely think that there is a strong possibility that they might have done.

I don't say this in any way to gloat or be triumphalistic, but it just looks possible to be likely to me.

I think the writers of 'Star Trek' would be aware of other sci-fi works, and would 'borrow' as much as the writers of 'Doctor Who' do....because I believe that the writers of 'Doctor Who' actually do this a lot from what I've seen, like many writers would.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borg

Quote:
“The classic Borg hail is as follows:

"We are the Borg. Lower your shields and power down your weapons. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated."

In the movie Star Trek: First Contact, the following hail is heard:

"We are the Borg. Lower your shields and surrender your ships. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Resistance is futile." The actor playing the role of "Voice of the Borg" in this film is Jeff Coopwood.

This saying bears a striking resemblance to the Cybermen expression: "Resistance is useless!" which was said on many occasions by them. Also in Doctor Who, the Cybermen's head leader, the Cybercontroller (equivalent to the Borg Queen) once stated to the Doctor, "To struggle is futile!" In the serial The Tomb of the Cybermen, the Cybercontroller says, "You belong to us. You will be like us."

A Vogon guard in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy also says "Resistance is useless!", but hardly with the same intentions as the Borg or the Cybercontroller. The link between these two other sci-fi genre sayings, though, is easy to explain. The author Douglas Adams was a screenwriter for Doctor Who before he started to write the Hitchhiker series.”

elan_vital
15-05-2006
Its not just Dr Who Star Trek have appeared to have nicked bits from:

Babylon 5, a series set on a space station with a central mythical figure (well, two actually - sinclair and sheridan), facilities including a casino, sick bay etc... The station circling a mysterious planet with a portal to a different time-space...

Lo! Deep Space 9... a series set on a space station, with a central mythical figure... well, you get the idea - or rather THEY did...
The_Master
15-05-2006
Originally Posted by elan_vital:
“Its not just Dr Who Star Trek have appeared to have nicked bits from:

Babylon 5, a series set on a space station with a central mythical figure (well, two actually - sinclair and sheridan), facilities including a casino, sick bay etc... The station circling a mysterious planet with a portal to a different time-space...

Lo! Deep Space 9... a series set on a space station, with a central mythical figure... well, you get the idea - or rather THEY did...”


Did Babylon 5 come first then? I seem to think I remember it did but it could be my memory playing tricks.
MoreTears
15-05-2006
Originally Posted by The_Master:
“Did Babylon 5 come first then? I seem to think I remember it did but it could be my memory playing tricks.”

Star Trek: Deep Space Nine debuted on American T.V., in syndication, in January 1993, and the two-hour pilot movie for Babylon 5 aired in syndication in the U.S. in February 1993.

Babylon 5 fans who insist that Paramount stole the idea for Deep Space Nine from Babylon 5 claim that prior to J. Michael Stracyznski selling his idea for Babylon 5 to Warner Brothers, he tried to sell it to Paramount, but Paramount rejected it. Their theory is that Paramount just incorporated Straczynski's ideas for Babylon 5 into the existing Star Trek universe that they already owned. Star Trek fans contend that Paramount didn't buy Straczynski's Babylon 5 because they just happened to have their own space station series already in development, which became Deep Space Nine. I think everybody has to admit that a space station idea is not exactly something completely new in science fiction, and in the television business similar concepts get simultaneously developed into what turns out to be competing projects all the time. For instance, I am sure it was just coincidence that last fall ABC premiered Invasion and CBS premiered Threshold, series not just about earth being invaded by aliens (a broad subject very well established in science fiction), but individual people being turned INTO aliens.
MIsguidedFool
15-05-2006
I just never understand the "you can only like one show" attitude that a lot of sci-fi fans seem to have.

Just enjoy it all whislt you can. We are very lucky that there is quite a lot of SF on TV at the moment.

Regards

MF
MoreTears
15-05-2006
Originally Posted by MIsguidedFool:
“I just never understand the "you can only like one show" attitude that a lot of sci-fi fans seem to have.

Just enjoy it all whislt you can. We are very lucky that there is quite a lot of SF on TV at the moment.

Regards

MF”


Obviously there is nothing wrong with disliking a show that really is bad, and speaking out against it, but when it comes to cult tv, I have noticed that many fans strongly identify with one particular show and act like their loyalty demands that they tear down every other cult show. Or somethimes they devote themselves to hating one particular show that is seen as a rival to their favourite. The war between Babylon 5 fans and Deep Space Nine fans that seemed to go on for years was unbelievably stupid to me. I rate Babylon 5 higher than Deep Space Nine, but Deep Space Nine is still very good.
elan_vital
15-05-2006
Originally Posted by MoreTears:
“ ...The war between Babylon 5 fans and Deep Space Nine fans that seemed to go on for years was unbelievably stupid to me. I rate Babylon 5 higher than Deep Space Nine, but Deep Space Nine is still very good.”


Agreed - with all. It's only TV after all

yours, with gloves on


"Trust the Corps"
salochin
15-05-2006
Originally Posted by MIsguidedFool:
“I just never understand the "you can only like one show" attitude that a lot of sci-fi fans seem to have.

Just enjoy it all whislt you can. We are very lucky that there is quite a lot of SF on TV at the moment.

Regards

MF”


I dont think thats what is being said, personally I love sci-fi shows in general.

I know there are some people who will not watch trek just because it is trek, but I am sure they are in the minority, just as those who will only watch one show and no other, but I think the majority of us will watch more than one and appreciate the good and bad bits of all of them.
Grand Dizzy
15-05-2006
The notion of using a camera to film some people who are pretending to be people they are not - has been done before.

Everything is plagarism!
10bellies
15-05-2006
Didn't Doctor Who nick that mind meld thing in last weeks episode from Spock?
Sooteries
15-05-2006
How can Cyberman be based on The Borg when the idea was in Doctor Who many years before Star Trek TNG hit the screens?
salochin
16-05-2006
Originally Posted by Sooteries:
“How can Cyberman be based on The Borg when the idea was in Doctor Who many years before Star Trek TNG hit the screens?”


No It was that the Borg are based on the cybermen (or at least have lots in common) not the otherway round
Topov
16-05-2006
And of course Power of the Daleks was set on Vulcan!
The_Master
16-05-2006
Originally Posted by Topov:
“And of course Power of the Daleks was set on Vulcan!”


But presumably no pointed ears and severe eyebrows in sight?
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map