Originally Posted by RoboScorpion:
“There are a load of threads spouting opinions on how CH4/Endemol are deliberately portraying certain housemates in only a good way and others in a bad way, and/or bringing in voting "twists" in order to make sure that CH4/Endemol's preferred housemate wins.
Can someone give me a convincing reason why CH4/Endemol would want any particular housemate to win over any of the others...?
I mean what do they stand to gain if Housemate-A wins, rather than Housemate-B?
RS”
Who knows really why Endemol tamper with the show. But they do. and for no good reason because what they do show is barely entertainment compared to the stuff they miss out. They slot housemates in character roles and run the show within storylines. The majority of the times the editing make the housemates less interesting than they normally are so it can't be for entertainment.
I suppose this is why people think they are fixing the votes by giving the viewers a false perception of the housemates.
Like I've said they've missed out a lot of really good stuff from housemates just because it didn't fit in with the character roles they've given them!
IMO the natural development of the housemates and the storylines and relationships that have actually evolved in the house have been far more interesting and captivating and provided a much more rounded entertaining experience than anything the editing team have given us.
So the question is why do Endemol give us poor storylines when the housemates have provided better ones? and why do they show good housemates as one dimensional rather than leave them the way they are.
It's not surprising that people saying it's a fix.
Last edited by bluntbob : 04-08-2006 at 10:04