I love how defensive you get whenever I criticise HC, yet you accuse me of being an employee of another company.
Trust me you couldn't be more wrong about who my employer is.
Thanks for looking through my post history looking for mud to throw because, as per, you couldn't contradict what I said, always a pleasure

You may want to actually read what you are using to sling mud though. I didn't tell that guy he didn't have ntl / Telewest, I said he wasn't on the service tier that he was slagging off.
I'm actually quite interested in where I slagged them off as opposed to stating facts.
Quote:
“Dunno, I ditched them for failing to offer much over freeview and failing to offer ADSL2+ services while most of the London based competition were merrily offering their 16, 22 and 24Mbit services and saved a few quid along the way.
The current service offerings aren't good enough for those who have a choice of suppliers, HC know this and this is why they are giving people 4 months free, to give themselves a chance to catch up a bit and get their cobbled together network into good order.”
All the above is fact afaik, network is being converted from legacy ATM to IP at the moment, there is no resiliency on bits of the core, or at least weren't, HC do not offer ADSL2+ and have a relatively limited channel line up.
I don't 'hate' Homechoice, I'm posting this from an HC connection. It's a reasonable service as far as it goes, just doesn't go far enough which I think is most people's criticism. I used the words 'cobbled together' from when my services died due to failure of a single network node. Not acceptable IMO.
BTW I wouldn't touch ntl/Telewest services with a barge pole, as anyone who actually knew me would know.
Who's pathetic the one who calls the other pathetic and libelous but can't actually answer the post in hand with anything barring mud slinging perhaps? Your continuous fanboyism is far more pathetic than anything I say.
I'm sure we've been though this all anyway, with exactly the same cycle, let's not go back that way again thanks. I post my opinion, you don't even give an opinion on my post you try and attack me personally.
Either back your post up with fact or shut up, don't try slinging mud and again completely inaccurately speculating on who I do and don't work for, it makes you look like an idiot especially considering your wildly inaccurate speculation and clear cheerleading of Homechoice in the past.
You may also want to look into the legal definitions of libel while you are at it. Amusing though it is you suggesting I'm being libelous due to disagreeing with you about your provider I'm afraid it doesn't work like that. I would suspect however that continously accusing someone of working for someone who they don't work for at all, and implying the commit libel is probably a little closer to it though.
Last edited by BBRealist : 20-09-2006 at 17:48