Originally Posted by Hamlet77:
“I have to say I think the music has been pretty awful this year. Every week I am struggling to here the tempo of the dance in various routines and failing abysmally.
Yes the pro's pick the music, but I wonder how much of it is influenced by what the BBC clipboard clutchers tell. I can see the pros wanting to use more traditional music, for no other reason than to help the celebs develope the rythm of the dances, but what happens when some no mark researcher says it's all very well using Strauss for a waltz, but have you thought of AC/DC or the theme from the X-Files instead?
Some might claim it is a dumming down of SCD, trying to 'popularise' ballroom dancing, but to me it sucks.”
Yes I’m sure the professionals choose the music, but considering how dire has been some, I’d say on occasions it’s been “Hobson’s choice.”
This business of "undue influence" by the BBC seems to escape many people on here.
What you see and hear on SCD and SCDT2 is exactly what the BBC want you to see and hear, apart from the "live action."
As I've said on an earlier thread, the producers chose the "worst" comment on Lousia and the "best" on Emma made by the four judges, to "help the viewers decide" before the votes closed in the "Results programme."
The producers of both programmes will have endless amounts of comment and training footage at their disposal taken over any number of weeks "with which to muck about" to project whichever perception of what's gone on they want the public to experience. I'm sure all the celebrities "throw a strop" sometimes, however I wonder if the most widely reported one last week will be shown on SCDT2 tonight?
We've done the "dodgy music." It came up on SCDT2.
Well actually the BBC haven't, they showed just the "good stuff."
If Claudia wasn't working to anything other than script which tells her what and what not to ask, why didn't she bring up "Eleanor Rigby" and ask Darren who chose that?
Because she was likely told to avoid that question.
The professional dancers do and say exactly what they are told to by the production department. Even Brendan falls in to line when push might come to shove. This programme is a "nice little earner" for all of them and no way would they jeopardise the possibility of coming back again next year.
Now before someone accuses me of being "paranoid" again. All I'm saying is “take everything with a pinch of salt."
When it comes to contentious issues, the BBC are "past masters" of obfuscation and "spin."
Last edited by Doghouse Riley : 06-11-2006 at 15:32