|
||||||||
Is all week voting fair? |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Matteshadom South West
Posts: 11,683
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pretty
Oh diddums
*blink*Okay... Yep, sure, some of them probably go on to get exposure, I expect some of them go on to get dance lessons from really great teachers, too (I know I would, if I had the chance) And I do think it's important that the judges are reasonably fair, (and I think the obvious biases this time are a shame) after all another of the aims (I assume/presume/understand) of Strictly is to bring ballroom to a wider audience, educate them about it, and maybe inspire people to take it up... good, fair judges won't do that aim any harm. Judges who are clueless about dancing could well do. Last edited by sarah-flute : 05-11-2006 at 22:31. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,212
|
I don't think the all week voting is fair (lots of things about SCD aren't fair), but I'm prepared to live with it for the sake of the show/spectacle that is SCD...
Without people rooting for couple X or being obsessed with pro/celeb Y, SCD wouldn't be what it is (i.e. the only thing on TV that I make time for). If everyone was like me and watched the show without getting involved in it (I don't vote), then SCD would be crap. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Matteshadom South West
Posts: 11,683
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainSensible
I don't think the all week voting is fair (lots of things about SCD aren't fair), but I'm prepared to live with it for the sake of the show/spectacle that is SCD...
Without people rooting for couple X or being obsessed with pro/celeb Y, SCD wouldn't be what it is (i.e. the only thing on TV that I make time for). If everyone was like me and watched the show without getting involved in it (I don't vote), then SCD would be crap. SCD isn't perfect or entirely "fair" or whatever, but I love it anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 592
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pretty
Jill Halfpenny was a worthy winner but the fact of the matter is that her exposure on SCD got her her West End gig! I would imagine a lot of the celebs who go on SCD also do so for a bit of exposure.
Incidentally, what happens to the portion of the call cost that doesn't go to Children in Need? Is it a case of "all profits to CIN, minimum 12 p" or does the other 13 p go to the BBC regardless of what it costs to run things? Or does the cash go to a phone company? Just wondering. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,840
|
The fact that people go on RTV shows for exposure doesn't guarantee them jobs as a result of their exposure. I thought that was just common sense!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Matteshadom South West
Posts: 11,683
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoDay
Incidentally, what happens to the portion of the call cost that doesn't go to Children in Need? Is it a case of "all profits to CIN, minimum 12 p" or does the other 13 p go to the BBC regardless of what it costs to run things? Or does the cash go to a phone company? Just wondering.
And guessing the other bit just goes towards having the call centre etc...? |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 12,487
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coody Mow
It's fair. It is for charity..and most people vote on the night.
I would be amazed if multi millionaires spent all time voting for their fav's in a week. And if they do..so what? It's for CIN. ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Matteshadom South West
Posts: 11,683
|
Unless she employs someone to vote for her - she can't. Or at least, you can't from the Netherlands, because Aeryn has tried, so I expect Posh couldn't from Spain, either.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:19.


*blink*
