DS Forums

 
 

Are there any 32" 1080p LCDs yet?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-11-2006, 12:58
willdew95
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Saffron Walden
Posts: 10

I'm looking for a new TV, and want 1080p resolution, as I'll be getting PS3 with blue-ray at some point.

However, I only have a small front room, and the 40" sets are really too big.

Does anyone make 1080p in 32" sets yet? My dilemma, is if not, do I go for the (too large) Sony KDL-40W2000 or better size (but lower resolution) Sony KDL-32V2000 - which I still think looks exceptionally good?

Last edited by willdew95 : 07-11-2006 at 13:00.
willdew95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 07-11-2006, 13:34
nick h
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 331
imo forget 1080p - at 32" it will mean nothing - if it really does at any size maybe bar large screen projectors?

just get something that looks pleasing to your eye and maybe place less emphasis on 'numbers'
nick h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 13:49
Badvok
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 957
I haven't seen any around yet, but I bet there will be when we get nearer to PS3 launch over here. There are definately sets available in the US.

One point to note though: some TVs are quoted as being 1080p compatible but they don't actually display it, they quote it as compatible because the HDMI interface can handle the data rates but these TVs will downscale the picture and you won't see any real benefit.

nick h: Since my 15" laptop screen can display 1400x1050 I don't see why a 32" TV would not show a significant improvement at 1080p.
Badvok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 14:08
nick h
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 331
Originally Posted by Badvok
I haven't seen any around yet, but I bet there will be when we get nearer to PS3 launch over here. There are definately sets available in the US.

One point to note though: some TVs are quoted as being 1080p compatible but they don't actually display it, they quote it as compatible because the HDMI interface can handle the data rates but these TVs will downscale the picture and you won't see any real benefit.

nick h: Since my 15" laptop screen can display 1400x1050 I don't see why a 32" TV would not show a significant improvement at 1080p.

i've seen a 1080p pioneer at circa £6k - not worth it imo
- as to on a 15" monitor

to get the best of hd imo you ned to be looking at 42"+ (viewing distance of course taken into account)
nick h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 14:11
nick h
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 331
anyway why the obession with 1080p - its a number

lets get 1080i right first

its like the chatter of 'more pixels makes a better picture' - its not - its how the screen processes and displays the image!

and btw i'm not talking from a review based viewpoint - I own and use a Toshiba HD-DVD player - displayed on a 50" Panny HD panel (not the consumer telly)

Last edited by nick h : 07-11-2006 at 14:26.
nick h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 15:30
Dan27
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: By The Sea
Posts: 9,574
1080p is useless below 37". Its not worth having because the human eye simply cant tell the difference. On larger panels it starts reaping benefits but on the smaller ones, no.

And forget PC monitor comparisons. Theyre interlaced, not progressive.
Dan27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 15:42
nick h
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 331
Dan
have you seen the 1080p Pioneer?

would appreciate your views
nick h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 15:59
blueboy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 2,052
I have the Sony Bravia 40"W2000 and i doubt i will get to use the 1080p for some time yet.

For now it is not important, but i always try to buy future proof products. Even the Xbox 360 has a new download that supports that format so maybe it is coming sooner than we think but maybe only in game format initially .Who really knows? Technology changes so rapidly these days.
blueboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 16:21
willdew95
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Saffron Walden
Posts: 10
I had made the decision to go with the Sony KDL-32V200 until I went to a Sony Store and saw the 40" V series and 40" W series side-by side.

They W was definitely a better picture. And is about £1500 as opposed to £1000 for the V. My thought was that the extra £500 would make me more future proof and as a Gran Turismo fan, I will be getting a PS3, so thought it a good idea to match to the blue-ray's output for best results.

Last edited by willdew95 : 07-11-2006 at 16:29.
willdew95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 21:39
blueboy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 2,052
Originally Posted by willdew95
I had made the decision to go with the Sony KDL-32V200 until I went to a Sony Store and saw the 40" V series and 40" W series side-by side.

They W was definitely a better picture. And is about £1500 as opposed to £1000 for the V. My thought was that the extra £500 would make me more future proof and as a Gran Turismo fan, I will be getting a PS3, so thought it a good idea to match to the blue-ray's output for best results.
Wise choice ! I bought this set to also get the best out of my xbox360 but i am sure i will buy the PS3 next year too.
blueboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2006, 00:43
bobcar
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 14,718
It's completely untrue that 1080p is not suitable for small TVs, the absolute screen size is not relevant, why do people keep making this mistake?

What matters is the ratio of screen size to viewing distance. A 28" at 5ft is larger than a 67" at 12ft.
bobcar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2006, 18:34
mikeydb
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bristol.
Posts: 1,783
Originally Posted by nick h
imo forget 1080p - at 32" it will mean nothing - if it really does at any size maybe bar large screen projectors?

just get something that looks pleasing to your eye and maybe place less emphasis on 'numbers'
That's a nice message but the numbers are the important thing if you're getting into High Definition, however if you're buying HD but have no access to HD content then spending hundreds of pounds on an HD display may be money wasted.
mikeydb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2006, 21:22
willdew95
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Saffron Walden
Posts: 10
I don't really understand the view that 1080p means nothing on anything other than vary large screen TVs. When in the shop looking at 1080p side by side with 720 it's clearly a better picture. My reason for wanting a 32" screen is I've got a relatively small front room, so don't want the screen to dominate it too much.

And I'll be getting a PS3 at some point next year, so will be able to take advantage of blu-ray.
willdew95 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:11.