• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • Entertainment Services
  • Terrestrial
  • Freeview+ Recorders
  • Humax
Which order do operations go in?
ByTheCringe
13-11-2006
If there is a fault that cannot be corrected with a power recycle at the rear switch, we are recommemded to restore to defaults, and if that doesn't work, format the disk. If you know you are going to format, is that the correct order:

1. Restore to defaults
2. Format the hard drive

Now what about an OTA firmware update. Which order do the three operations go in?

1. Upgrade
2. Restore to defaults
3. Format the hard drive

Are these all in the correct order?
marcdavis
13-11-2006
If the problems were disk related I would do a reformat, so there is nothing in the table, then do a reset to default settings.
redrob2
13-11-2006
Originally Posted by marcdavis:
“If the problems were disk related I would do a reformat, so there is nothing in the table, then do a reset to default settings.”

followed by another reformat for good measure
ByTheCringe
13-11-2006
Er, thanks guys. I was wondering whether there was some scientific answer to this, but it sounds as if just do everything twice might be the best answer...
lancer
13-11-2006
Originally Posted by ByTheCringe:
“Now what about an OTA firmware update. Which order do the three operations go in?

1. Upgrade
2. Restore to defaults
3. Format the hard drive

Are these all in the correct order?”

I've never seen any advice anywhere that you should re-format following an update. After all, this would not really be practical. I believe that 1 & 2 are correct, but not 3.
marcdavis
13-11-2006
Originally Posted by ByTheCringe:
“Er, thanks guys. I was wondering whether there was some scientific answer to this, but it sounds as if just do everything twice might be the best answer... ”

my stab was based on having the fat wiped first and not have anything want to write to it (like the start of a new recording) then flush the memory with a rest to default settings. Probably wont make any difference which way though. I'll be interested in hearing more theories on this if there are any.
ByTheCringe
13-11-2006
The reformat IS needed after updating from 1.04 to 1.06, to kill the "lose all the library" bug stone dead. Since I never did it, it is on my list.
marcdavis
13-11-2006
Originally Posted by lancer:
“I've never seen any advice anywhere that you should re-format following an update. After all, this would not really be practical. I believe that 1 & 2 are correct, but not 3.”

If I was going for a software update from .04 or earlier I would involve the reformat as part of clearing the issue with lost recordings.
lancer
13-11-2006
Originally Posted by ByTheCringe:
“The reformat IS needed after updating from 1.04 to 1.06, to kill the "lose all the library" bug stone dead. Since I never did it, it is on my list.”

Blimey - I missed that when I got .06 OTA!

Am I right in saying, though, that not everyone will suffer from that .04 problem??
ByTheCringe
13-11-2006
I think very few people are affected. Also, it may not be a problem after recordings made in 1.04 are all deleted - I'm waiting for news from Barry about that.
lancer
13-11-2006
Originally Posted by ByTheCringe:
“I think very few people are affected. Also, it may not be a problem after recordings made in 1.04 are all deleted - I'm waiting for news from Barry about that.”

I can see why that would be true. As I understand it, a re-format only deletes all recordings anyway...so a gradual one by one deletion of all .04 recordings should, presumably, end up producing the same result.
marcdavis
13-11-2006
Originally Posted by ByTheCringe:
“I think very few people are affected. Also, it may not be a problem after recordings made in 1.04 are all deleted - I'm waiting for news from Barry about that.”

BTC in my opinion its the recordings table that needs to get wiped completely as it might have some rubbish or corruption in it. Deleting recordings made under a previous software isnt much cop because they are not wiped/actually deleted from the hard drive - just ignored by the file table while it is working OK.
Last edited by marcdavis : 13-11-2006 at 15:13
ByTheCringe
13-11-2006
Originally Posted by marcdavis:
“BTC in my opinion its the recordings table that needs to get wiped completely as it might have some rubbish or corruption in it. Deleting recordings made under a previous software isnt much cop because they are not wiped/actually deleted from the hard drive - just ignored by the file table while it is working OK.”

I tend to agree with you, Marc - I was reaching for straws. Would still like the definitive answer from Humax though.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map