Originally Posted by luckyforest:
“And that's the very reason why she's last in the public vote, simply because she doesn't deserve it.”
And thats why mathematically challenged people keep on making the same points.
The fact is someone has to be top. If its not Emma it has to be someone else and either the gap is too large or you can make the same arguments about the someone else and the judging as you can about Emma.
The gap between Emma and everyone but Mark is more substantial than the odd mark from Bruno . Someone else would need a lot more marks to catch up let alone put Emma anywhere near the bottom
As Gritty points out all the judges prefer the styles of different dancers - for every extra mark thrown at Emma there are other marks thrown at the people in real contention below her - Arlene for Mark, Bruno for Louisa. if you adjusted it all it would still come out in much the same order .
As Gritty also points out some markers undermark Emma and Louisa relative to the average. Its a two way process.
The point is that 3 judges have Emma first over the series and the other one has her second. If the judges are that sure she is in the top two its pretty clear she doesn't belong in the bottom two.
The real problem is with the public vote that puts her at or next to the bottom. Its not even just her as Louisa and Claire have both had the same problem too. Its bad enough that who has gone so far has been determined by voters voting to save people who danced badly with the result that someone who danced better most weeks went, but we now have people not voting for the better dancers on the grounds that the teachers like them, they are good, they might have danced before in their lives, they are not rhythmically challenged and they are not hunky males or they are younger than the viewers.
The anti judge vote is frankly just perverse. Its illogical enough not to vote for someone because the judges like them. Chances are the judges know what they are doing between them. Even if they don't, its childish to vote against someone or decide not to vote for them regardless of how good they are just because the judges like them or give them extra marks. Its the attitude of the class moron who bullies the teacher's pet. Its also not their fault if judges like them - what are they meant to do refuse the marks? Its also impossible for the public to adjust the judges marks. The change required is small - Bruno's one point for Emma - and inconsequential (Peter needed to beat three other people as well as Emma to survive ) The consequence of people not voting for her because of it though is large - a top dancer ends up in the bottom two - its totally disproportionate. . I know most people have never been top at anything in their lives, but its pretty incredible that on every reality TV show currently voters are voting for the people who the judges criticise and not voting for the ones they praise - its not everyone but its enough to swing the votes and its a decidedly deviant way of voting when its not motivated by personality or stories but simply dislike of judges.
Last edited by thenetworkbabe : 21-11-2006 at 03:07