Have been watching ITT since last series and it seems to me to invite the judges to ITT is to give them the chance to justify their comments. It sounds reasonable but the trouble is the judges are so inconsistent and self-contradictory. They can't even be consistent in a few minutes' time. Take Craig as an example (for he's in ITT every week)
example one: Craig said he honestly believes that the judges are absolute honest and fair, then one minute later when he was asked if Arlene has undermarked Brendan & Clare on their foxtrot, he said yes, a higher mark would be more fair, but he has no control on other judges' marks ...(so where did this 'the judges are absolutely fair came from?)
example two: Craig were all complementary about Coral & Matthew's American Smooth on a Thursday. Then the following week he said he's disappointed with Matt as there were so many things he could have sorted out in the training (training that he has full of praise), when he was challenged by Claudia that he's full of praise about their training. He then said when things went wrong on live. (note: If this is the case, why is he disappointed with Matthew? Matthew can't predict what will happen, can he?) Craig is so self-contradictory, I'm sure he argue a lot with himself.
These people are hopeless, what's the point of having these people arguing with themselves on ITT, it's wasting of time. Besides, the viewers have heard enough from the judges. It'd be better to hear from other people, people who are relatively consistent.
example one: Craig said he honestly believes that the judges are absolute honest and fair, then one minute later when he was asked if Arlene has undermarked Brendan & Clare on their foxtrot, he said yes, a higher mark would be more fair, but he has no control on other judges' marks ...(so where did this 'the judges are absolutely fair came from?)
example two: Craig were all complementary about Coral & Matthew's American Smooth on a Thursday. Then the following week he said he's disappointed with Matt as there were so many things he could have sorted out in the training (training that he has full of praise), when he was challenged by Claudia that he's full of praise about their training. He then said when things went wrong on live. (note: If this is the case, why is he disappointed with Matthew? Matthew can't predict what will happen, can he?) Craig is so self-contradictory, I'm sure he argue a lot with himself.
These people are hopeless, what's the point of having these people arguing with themselves on ITT, it's wasting of time. Besides, the viewers have heard enough from the judges. It'd be better to hear from other people, people who are relatively consistent.
