DS Forums

 
 

According to the Star


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27-11-2006, 03:14
Omah
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 22,532

THE jungle camp is looking more like a casualty ward after half of the stars became walking wounded.

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news_detail.html?sku=780
Omah is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 27-11-2006, 08:32
♣ Moya
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 22,629
That link explains why Lauren felt faint after the trial.

<snip>

Bushtucker Trial – called Jungle Falls – almost ended in disaster. Lauren, Phina and Dean Gaffney, 28, were all chosen to do the task.
The three celebs were attached to a crane for a bungee jump in which they had to throw paint bombs at targets on the ground below.
But the crane broke down, leaving the three stars standing around in soaring
temperatures of 35oC while it was fixed.
♣ Moya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-11-2006, 09:34
Aladdin Sane
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 22
Hmmmm Phina didn't mention any of that to Faith when she was slagging off Lauren's efforts
Aladdin Sane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-11-2006, 09:37
marling
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: London
Posts: 3,532
Originally Posted by Aladdin Sane
Hmmmm Phina didn't mention any of that to Faith when she was slagging off Lauren's efforts
Maybe she broke the crane with her evil ways or maybe IACGMOOH prefer bad edits of Phina
marling is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-11-2006, 09:42
Komol
Banned User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 888
Originally Posted by Aladdin Sane
Hmmmm Phina didn't mention any of that to Faith when she was slagging off Lauren's efforts
You do know that the highlights show is not LIVE, right?
Komol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-11-2006, 11:23
jodenice
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 164
But edited or not - the remarks still have to be made to be shown. Its no good blaming bad editing if you are in fact slag*ing off all and sundry.
jodenice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-11-2006, 11:31
Komol
Banned User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 888
Originally Posted by jodenice
But edited or not - the remarks still have to be made to be shown. Its no good blaming bad editing if you are in fact slag*ing off all and sundry.
What remarks? The ones she did or did not make?
Komol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-11-2006, 11:58
jodenice
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 164
Originally Posted by marling
Maybe she broke the crane with her evil ways or maybe IACGMOOH prefer bad edits of Phina
In the case of bitching about Lauren when she wasn't there, whether it was a bad edit or not, these remarks were made. If she didn't say it, they couldn't show it.
jodenice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-11-2006, 12:31
Komol
Banned User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 888
Originally Posted by jodenice
In the case of bitching about Lauren when she wasn't there, whether it was a bad edit or not, these remarks were made. If she didn't say it, they couldn't show it.
That's better. For a second, I thought you were making a random comment in light of your previous post!
Komol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-11-2006, 13:22
jodenice
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 164
Originally Posted by Komol
That's better. For a second, I thought you were making a random comment in light of your previous post!

jodenice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-11-2006, 13:29
Komol
Banned User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 888
Originally Posted by jodenice
Your comment in post 6 above didn't seem to be in response to any of the comments made on this thread at that point!
Komol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-11-2006, 13:29
jodenice
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 164
Apart from the second one above it you mean?
jodenice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-11-2006, 13:33
Komol
Banned User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 888
Originally Posted by jodenice
Apart from the second one above it you mean?
If you don't mind me asking, what post were you replying to in your post 6?
Komol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-11-2006, 13:37
autumn
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,914
The producers are very selective in what they show. I assume the rest of the campers probably guessed there was something wrong, as they were away from the camp so long.

There was no mention of Phina being given treatment as well, from Lauren or Phina herself. This was probably edited. The producers know that the average viewer is very easily manipulated, (one dimensional thinking) so they don't even have to try too hard!

I assume that they all say negative things about each other sometimes, it's only natural considering the situation they're in, we just don't see it all.
autumn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-11-2006, 13:41
Joany3
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sandhurst
Posts: 1,402
Originally Posted by autumn
The producers are very selective in what they show. I assume the rest of the campers probably guessed there was something wrong, as they were away from the camp so long.

There was no mention of Phina being given treatment as well, from Lauren or Phina herself. This was probably edited. The producers know that the average viewer is very easily manipulated, (one dimensional thinking) so they don't even have to try too hard!

I assume that they all say negative things about each other sometimes, it's only natural considering the situation they're in, we just don't see it all.
Exactly what is wrong with IACGMOH this year....no live feed just selective highlights to manipulate the viewer to vote how the producers want the show to progress....it sucks!
Joany3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-11-2006, 13:46
jodenice
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 164
Originally Posted by Komol
If you don't mind me asking, what post were you replying to in your post 6?
I was responding to somebody (I think it was Marling) suggesting that maybe phina got a bad edit, with the fact that they couldn't show her bitching unless she WAS bitching. Selective editing is only possible where people provide the conversation.

It was a big issue in BB too, but without the ammunition they wouldn't have been able to do it. Simple.
jodenice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-11-2006, 13:49
Komol
Banned User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 888
Originally Posted by jodenice
I was responding to somebody (I think it was Marling) suggesting that maybe phina got a bad edit, with the fact that they couldn't show her bitching unless she WAS bitching. Selective editing is only possible where people provide the conversation.

It was a big issue in BB too, but without the ammunition they wouldn't have been able to do it. Simple.
But that wasn't marling's point! If you read the post s/he was responding to, you'll realise the poster was suggesting that Phina witheld information about the BTT during her bitching session with Faith were she slagged off Lauren's efforts!

Last edited by Komol : 27-11-2006 at 13:50.
Komol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-11-2006, 13:51
jodenice
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 164
Ok thats fine, its obviously really important to you, there was no mention of 'bad edits of Phina', the whole conversation, directly above us is a figment of my imagination.

Sheesh.
jodenice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-11-2006, 13:52
jodenice
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 164
anyway, fun that its been, got to get back to work. I expect the argument to rage on in my absence.
jodenice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-11-2006, 13:52
autumn
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,914
If you particularly dislike some of the contestants, they will always be seen as villians no matter what they do. Your bias precludes their every comment/action. You are far more likely to make allowances for competitors that you empathise with. I don't really care who wins. They are all much of a muchness in these shows, and we really have no idea of the competitors true personalities.
autumn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-11-2006, 13:54
Komol
Banned User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 888
Originally Posted by jodenice
Ok thats fine, its obviously really important to you, there was no mention of 'bad edits of Phina', the whole conversation, directly above us is a figment of my imagination.

Sheesh.
You said it!
Komol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-11-2006, 14:40
Mrs Cee Jay
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 957
I cannot do links but if you go to the Daily Star website, it appears that Phina and Lauren were not too impressed with Myleenes efforts to win 9 meals. Jealousy rears its ugly head.
Mrs Cee Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-11-2006, 14:41
Komol
Banned User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 888
Originally Posted by Mrs Cee Jay
I cannot do links but if you go to the Daily Star website, it appears that Phina and Lauren were not too impressed with Myleenes efforts to win 9 meals. Jealousy rears its ugly head.
Hmmm, I wonder why the producers did not show this! They usually don't miss a trick

Last edited by Komol : 27-11-2006 at 14:44.
Komol is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:39.