THE jungle camp is looking more like a casualty ward after half of the stars became walking wounded.
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news_detail.html?sku=780
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news_detail.html?sku=780
According to the Star
That link explains why Lauren felt faint after the trial.
<snip>
<snip>
Quote:
“Bushtucker Trial – called Jungle Falls – almost ended in disaster. Lauren, Phina and Dean Gaffney, 28, were all chosen to do the task.
The three celebs were attached to a crane for a bungee jump in which they had to throw paint bombs at targets on the ground below.
But the crane broke down, leaving the three stars standing around in soaring
temperatures of 35oC while it was fixed.”
“Bushtucker Trial – called Jungle Falls – almost ended in disaster. Lauren, Phina and Dean Gaffney, 28, were all chosen to do the task.
The three celebs were attached to a crane for a bungee jump in which they had to throw paint bombs at targets on the ground below.
But the crane broke down, leaving the three stars standing around in soaring
temperatures of 35oC while it was fixed.”
Originally Posted by Aladdin Sane:
“Hmmmm Phina didn't mention any of that to Faith when she was slagging off Lauren's efforts”
“Hmmmm Phina didn't mention any of that to Faith when she was slagging off Lauren's efforts”
Maybe she broke the crane with her evil ways or maybe IACGMOOH prefer bad edits of Phina
Originally Posted by Aladdin Sane:
“Hmmmm Phina didn't mention any of that to Faith when she was slagging off Lauren's efforts”
“Hmmmm Phina didn't mention any of that to Faith when she was slagging off Lauren's efforts”
You do know that the highlights show is not LIVE, right?
But edited or not - the remarks still have to be made to be shown. Its no good blaming bad editing if you are in fact slag*ing off all and sundry.
Originally Posted by jodenice:
“But edited or not - the remarks still have to be made to be shown. Its no good blaming bad editing if you are in fact slag*ing off all and sundry.”
“But edited or not - the remarks still have to be made to be shown. Its no good blaming bad editing if you are in fact slag*ing off all and sundry.”
What remarks? The ones she did or did not make?
Originally Posted by marling:
“Maybe she broke the crane with her evil ways or maybe IACGMOOH prefer bad edits of Phina”
“Maybe she broke the crane with her evil ways or maybe IACGMOOH prefer bad edits of Phina
”
In the case of bitching about Lauren when she wasn't there, whether it was a bad edit or not, these remarks were made. If she didn't say it, they couldn't show it.
Originally Posted by jodenice:
“In the case of bitching about Lauren when she wasn't there, whether it was a bad edit or not, these remarks were made. If she didn't say it, they couldn't show it.”
“In the case of bitching about Lauren when she wasn't there, whether it was a bad edit or not, these remarks were made. If she didn't say it, they couldn't show it.”
That's better. For a second, I thought you were making a random comment in light of your previous post!
Originally Posted by Komol:
“That's better. For a second, I thought you were making a random comment in light of your previous post!”
“That's better. For a second, I thought you were making a random comment in light of your previous post!”
Originally Posted by jodenice:
“”
“
”
Your comment in post 6 above didn't seem to be in response to any of the comments made on this thread at that point!
Originally Posted by jodenice:
“Apart from the second one above it you mean?”
“Apart from the second one above it you mean?”
If you don't mind me asking, what post were you replying to in your post 6?
The producers are very selective in what they show. I assume the rest of the campers probably guessed there was something wrong, as they were away from the camp so long.
There was no mention of Phina being given treatment as well, from Lauren or Phina herself. This was probably edited. The producers know that the average viewer is very easily manipulated, (one dimensional thinking) so they don't even have to try too hard!
I assume that they all say negative things about each other sometimes, it's only natural considering the situation they're in, we just don't see it all.
There was no mention of Phina being given treatment as well, from Lauren or Phina herself. This was probably edited. The producers know that the average viewer is very easily manipulated, (one dimensional thinking) so they don't even have to try too hard!
I assume that they all say negative things about each other sometimes, it's only natural considering the situation they're in, we just don't see it all.
Originally Posted by autumn:
“The producers are very selective in what they show. I assume the rest of the campers probably guessed there was something wrong, as they were away from the camp so long.
There was no mention of Phina being given treatment as well, from Lauren or Phina herself. This was probably edited. The producers know that the average viewer is very easily manipulated, (one dimensional thinking) so they don't even have to try too hard!
I assume that they all say negative things about each other sometimes, it's only natural considering the situation they're in, we just don't see it all.”
“The producers are very selective in what they show. I assume the rest of the campers probably guessed there was something wrong, as they were away from the camp so long.
There was no mention of Phina being given treatment as well, from Lauren or Phina herself. This was probably edited. The producers know that the average viewer is very easily manipulated, (one dimensional thinking) so they don't even have to try too hard!
I assume that they all say negative things about each other sometimes, it's only natural considering the situation they're in, we just don't see it all.”
Exactly what is wrong with IACGMOH this year....no live feed just selective highlights to manipulate the viewer to vote how the producers want the show to progress....it sucks!
Originally Posted by Komol:
“If you don't mind me asking, what post were you replying to in your post 6?”
“If you don't mind me asking, what post were you replying to in your post 6?”
I was responding to somebody (I think it was Marling) suggesting that maybe phina got a bad edit, with the fact that they couldn't show her bitching unless she WAS bitching. Selective editing is only possible where people provide the conversation.
It was a big issue in BB too, but without the ammunition they wouldn't have been able to do it. Simple.
Originally Posted by jodenice:
“I was responding to somebody (I think it was Marling) suggesting that maybe phina got a bad edit, with the fact that they couldn't show her bitching unless she WAS bitching. Selective editing is only possible where people provide the conversation.
It was a big issue in BB too, but without the ammunition they wouldn't have been able to do it. Simple.”
“I was responding to somebody (I think it was Marling) suggesting that maybe phina got a bad edit, with the fact that they couldn't show her bitching unless she WAS bitching. Selective editing is only possible where people provide the conversation.
It was a big issue in BB too, but without the ammunition they wouldn't have been able to do it. Simple.”
But that wasn't marling's point! If you read the post s/he was responding to, you'll realise the poster was suggesting that Phina witheld information about the BTT during her bitching session with Faith were she slagged off Lauren's efforts!
Last edited by Komol : 27-11-2006 at 13:50
Ok thats fine, its obviously really important to you, there was no mention of 'bad edits of Phina', the whole conversation, directly above us is a figment of my imagination.
Sheesh.
Sheesh.
If you particularly dislike some of the contestants, they will always be seen as villians no matter what they do. Your bias precludes their every comment/action. You are far more likely to make allowances for competitors that you empathise with. I don't really care who wins. They are all much of a muchness in these shows, and we really have no idea of the competitors true personalities.
Originally Posted by jodenice:
“Ok thats fine, its obviously really important to you, there was no mention of 'bad edits of Phina', the whole conversation, directly above us is a figment of my imagination.
Sheesh.”
“Ok thats fine, its obviously really important to you, there was no mention of 'bad edits of Phina', the whole conversation, directly above us is a figment of my imagination.
Sheesh.”
You said it!
I cannot do links but if you go to the Daily Star website, it appears that Phina and Lauren were not too impressed with Myleenes efforts to win 9 meals. Jealousy rears its ugly head.
Originally Posted by Mrs Cee Jay:
“I cannot do links but if you go to the Daily Star website, it appears that Phina and Lauren were not too impressed with Myleenes efforts to win 9 meals. Jealousy rears its ugly head.”
“I cannot do links but if you go to the Daily Star website, it appears that Phina and Lauren were not too impressed with Myleenes efforts to win 9 meals. Jealousy rears its ugly head.”
Hmmm, I wonder why the producers did not show this! They usually don't miss a trick
Last edited by Komol : 27-11-2006 at 14:44
