The editing on this edition must be the most biased of them all. Why don't they put arrows on as well, pointing at who we should vote for? I agree with the choices, but they could be a tiny bit more subtle.
Originally Posted by PamelaL: “I suppose we haven't but then again we haven't seen much of any of the contestants' intelligence. But the assumption that because someone is good looking they can't be intelligent is bulltish. ”
Thank-you
+ have seen some impressively bright academics do dafter stuff than accidently melt a few candles.