Originally Posted by tom green:
“Ifyou think the BBC intentionally blocked phonelines then you are an idiot,Zoe ball was in the bottom 2 for 2 if not 3 shows last year and got to the final.No one accused the bbc of fixing the show then.When wll realise that an independent adjudicator monitors voing”
Well last year - I could understand why Zoe was in the bottom two a couple of times. The judges loved her and I didn't personally believe that they over-marked her because I could see that she was technically good. however I didn't warm to her and therefore I didn't vote for her and I assumed the rest of GBP felt the same. Therefore no question of 'Fix'.
This year I just cannot see what the judges are raving about in Emma. I am not against her - I don't hate her - I just don't see what she is doing that is so good and every week when the judges give her 10 and rave, I naturally vote for someone who I do 'get' - which has changed over the weeks. What does Mark have to do to get a 10? His waltz tonight was flawless - as good as Matt's a couple of weeks ago, definitely better than Emma's last week but still no sniff of a 10?
And I was one of the people couldn't get through for Louisa in the dance-off because I loved her joie de vivre and thought that she lit up the dance floor despite some poor arm lines and occasional fumbles.