|
||||||||
Anyone else hate Widescreen TV's |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ayrshire
Posts: 3,700
|
Anyone else hate Widescreen TV's
Hi folks! anyone else out there hate large say 28" + Tv's that have that awful picture that everyone is fat! and often many are way to pixille! What is that all about! Im quite happy with my standard 21" great picture standard letterbox type TV that everyone looks the correct size in!
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 919
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnexOne
Hi folks! anyone else out there hate large say 28" + Tv's that have that awful picture that everyone is fat! and often many are way to pixille! What is that all about! Im quite happy with my standard 21" great picture standard letterbox type TV that everyone looks the correct size in!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,313
|
No, what I hate is people who have widescreen TVs and have them wrongly set-up so that everybody appears fat. It's not difficult to configure the Sky or Freeview box and DVD player to output an anamorphic signal, but too many people are too lazy to bother doing it, and just live with the fat picture.
But to put the blame for this at the television's feet is a mistake. Why would anybody prefer to watch movies or programmes where there are either intrusive black bands at the top and bottom of the screen, or even worse, the dreaded pan and scan kicks in and all action from the edges of the picture are lost? Widescreen is here to stay, and anybody who says they hate it is not a true television/cinema lover. Still, some people couldn't get to grips with colour TV broadcasts either... |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 14,718
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnexOne
Hi folks! anyone else out there hate large say 28" + Tv's that have that awful picture that everyone is fat! and often many are way to pixille! What is that all about! Im quite happy with my standard 21" great picture standard letterbox type TV that everyone looks the correct size in!
So many people have their TVs set automatically to wide that many people think that's how they're supposed to be even for 4:3 viewing. Many Sky boxes, Cable boxes, Freeview boxes, DVD players etc are set up to output a 4:3 picture which is then stretched to fattyvision on a widescreen TV. 16:9 is a good compromise; 4:3 programmes will have bars on the side, 2.35:1 will have bars on the top and bottom while the now standard (for TV) 16:9 will have no bars. By contrast if set up properly your 4:3 TV will have no bars for 4:3 (old TV programmes, CH4 news, old films) but will have bars top and bottom for 16:9 and huge bars for 2.35:1. EDIT: I must learn to type more quickly, the two previous posters beat me to it. Last edited by bobcar : 21-12-2006 at 10:27. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South East
Posts: 4,638
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnexOne
Hi folks! anyone else out there hate large say 28" + Tv's that have that awful picture that everyone is fat! and often many are way to pixille! What is that all about! Im quite happy with my standard 21" great picture standard letterbox type TV that everyone looks the correct size in!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ayrshire
Posts: 3,700
|
ill have to get the aspect ratio correct, and tell them! to change it! does my head in!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Essex.
Posts: 2,623
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by broadz
No, what I hate is people who have widescreen TVs and have them wrongly set-up so that everybody appears fat. It's not difficult to configure the Sky or Freeview box and DVD player to output an anamorphic signal, but too many people are too lazy to bother doing it, and just live with the fat picture.
But to put the blame for this at the television's feet is a mistake. Why would anybody prefer to watch movies or programmes where there are either intrusive black bands at the top and bottom of the screen, or even worse, the dreaded pan and scan kicks in and all action from the edges of the picture are lost? Widescreen is here to stay, and anybody who says they hate it is not a true television/cinema lover. Still, some people couldn't get to grips with colour TV broadcasts either... |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ayrshire
Posts: 3,700
|
Give me a good 21" tv with a crisp clear picture to that of a widescreen fat pixelli tv any day!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,313
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Master
That is a ridiculous statement to make. I hate Widescreen TVs they are too big and have a terrible picture. I love TV and cinema though, sometimes less is more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,378
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Master
That is a ridiculous statement to make. I hate Widescreen TVs they are too big and have a terrible picture. I love TV and cinema though, sometimes less is more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,041
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnexOne
Hi folks! anyone else out there hate large say 28" + Tv's that have that awful picture that everyone is fat! and often many are way to pixille! What is that all about! Im quite happy with my standard 21" great picture standard letterbox type TV that everyone looks the correct size in!
I remember the first program I saw was in dixons, it was You've Been framed with Lisa Dingle from emmerdale and she looked HUUUUUUUUGGGGGGGGGEEEEE. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Herts
Posts: 17,006
|
With my parents cheapo CRT TV the settings choice is either 4:3 or 16:9. On 16:9 everything gets stretched to fill the screen but not evenly. This gives some hilarious pictures sometimes with people having one fat arm and one normal looking one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The dark side of the moon
Posts: 51,381
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnexOne
Give me a good 21" tv with a crisp clear picture to that of a widescreen fat pixelli tv any day!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,313
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dundee_mark
Er...we have a 28" CRT and the picture is perfectly clear, with no "fat people".
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The dark side of the moon
Posts: 51,381
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by broadz
What about Lisa Dingle? Or Christopher Biggins? Or Fred Elliot? Or Jabba The Hut? You must have a magic telly if they're not fat.
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ayrshire
Posts: 3,700
|
put it this way watching the like footie matches does my head in! all these short fat blokes running around! i thought it was a rugby match i was watching to begin with then found out it was the widescreen tv.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The dark side of the moon
Posts: 51,381
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnexOne
put it this way watching the like footie matches does my head in! all these short fat blokes running around! i thought it was a rugby match i was watching to begin with then found out it was the widescreen tv.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Worcester
Posts: 4,850
|
Well, instead of complaining about it on a forum.
Get out the sodding manual to the TV, and do something about changing the settings so the people are no longer stretched, it's quite simple! Honestly, some people... It's not rocket science. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,313
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnexOne
put it this way watching the like footie matches does my head in! all these short fat blokes running around! i thought it was a rugby match i was watching to begin with then found out it was the widescreen tv.
You'd have an equal but opposite problem if the Sky or Freeview box had been set up to output an anamorphic picture and you were watching on a 4:3 box, everyone would be too tall and thin. That would be like me complaining because a programme I was watching was too quiet, when all I would have to do is turn the volume up. It's not the TVs fault that I've got the volume turned too low. Have a quiet word with these friends of yours who've spent money on a widescreen TV but not set it up properly and tell them how to configure the display properties of their digital TV box - they'll thank you in the end. Or stay at home and watch your titchy little 4:3 telly where you can only see two-thirds of the picture, while we all watch the match in its full widescreen glory and appreciate the fact that we can see much more than you can. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ayrshire
Posts: 3,700
|
wait a minute! i see all of the picture on my 21" tv as its set to letterbox! and that shows all the picture! and a crisp clear one at that!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The dark side of the moon
Posts: 51,381
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnexOne
wait a minute! i see all of the picture on my 21" tv as its set to letterbox! and that shows all the picture! and a crisp clear one at that!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kingston Upon Thames
Posts: 1,516
|
I remember the first widescreen TV I had a rather irritating flaw of displaying any RGB signal as 16:9, so I had the option of changing my OnDigital box to composite or putting up with fat people. The fat people won.
Every TV I've had since has handles aspect ratio correctly, although it's not such as issue anymore as nearly every programme is in widescreen nowadays. As far as football is concerned, I thought it was all broadcast in widescreen anyway, so not only get fat players but also lose a third of the picture. As has been mentioned, the Sky/cable/digibox needs to be set up to output 16:9. Last edited by stafs : 21-12-2006 at 13:10. |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Essex
Posts: 287
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnexOne
wait a minute! i see all of the picture on my 21" tv as its set to letterbox! and that shows all the picture! and a crisp clear one at that!
I hope it has a scart socket otherwise nothing will be crips or clear in 10 yrs time. Do you brag to your mates about your 21" CRT? I bet your place is packed on match days!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,313
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by slacker17
How close to the TV do you need to sit to watch it? Does it give you that cinema effect? Doubt it.
I hope it has a scart socket otherwise nothing will be crips or clear in 10 yrs time. Do you brag to your mates about your 21" CRT? I bet your place is packed on match days!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,522
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnexOne
wait a minute! i see all of the picture on my 21" tv as its set to letterbox! and that shows all the picture! and a crisp clear one at that!
I would have to move the sofa and chairs in 4 feet to be able to see the picture on a 21" TV! Zen |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:59.



