|
||||||||
Kim Tate or Sadie King? |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,750
|
Kim Tate or Sadie King?
Which would you say was the best? I watched Emmerdale a lot when Kim was there because i thought she was such a great character, and Claire King played the part brilliantly. I don't watch Emmerdale regularly anymore, and when Sadie was in the show, i only really saw bits of her. What i saw seemed okay, and Patsy Kensit played the part well enough, but for me nothing could beat Kim Tate.
What do you think? Kim or Sadie? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 524
|
i'm notsure,
Sadie was a bigger bitch i think, wen we look bak i just think kim had a handful of nasty things! i think its like doctor who or james bond: people will say who was your emmerdale bitch? i think its to do with how much u watched it wen they were in the show, if that makes any sence! #enterfunnyname# |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 717
|
Claire King can ACT. Kim was multi dimensional, Sadie was one note. This is seriously a POINTLESS question.
Since a lot of posters around here are pretty young, i doubt they remember Kim. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Londonary
Posts: 284
|
Both were very similar yet so different at the same time.
Sadie could not cope with murder like Kim. Yet Kim couldn't pull off a blackmail plot as well as Sadie did. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Here, There and Everywhere
Posts: 5,524
|
I loved Sadie ... but KIM TATE is the ultimate bitch of Emmerdale.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Summer Bay
Posts: 5,891
|
There is only one answer to this question. Kim Tate. I have never really liked Sadie and think Kim is one of the best soap bitches ever!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Kim Tate definately by far
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,237
|
Kim Tate every time
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 1,551
|
Kim Tate. I mean, Sadie was good, but Kim was THAT chick.
I would love to see a return for Kim some time as it would bring so much more to the show. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,034
|
Oh god Kim Tate definitely. Sadie King doesn't even come close.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,109
|
My God there is no question that Kim Tate was better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In the Shires
Posts: 18,191
|
I've got to say Kim Tate. Claire is by for the better actress than Patsy. The characters were similar in many ways though. They both liked a "bit of rough" and both loved animals. Their gold-digging tendencies ran along similar lines too.
To sum them up I'd say that although Kim was a bitch you couldn't help but love her. Sadie wasn't someone I could warm to (except when her dog died)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 796
|
Kim Tate. Sadie was awful
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ashtray City
Posts: 4,786
|
Kim Tate. The scene where Frank died in front of her will live in my mind forever.
Kim Tate WAS emmerdale. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 14,039
|
I like Sadie, but Kim Tate will always be my favourite.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 15,702
|
Sadie was good but Kim Tate was even better!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 857
|
Didn't watch Emmerdale when Kim Tate was in - so Sadie gets my vote by default. Anyway, Sadie has always been my favourite soap character.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,347
|
Kim Tate was fabulous, Sadie was slated and so was Patsy Kensit but she did add a lot to the show and she will be missed. Kim and Sadie were both fabulous, but Kim was the better bitch...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central London
Posts: 43,722
|
Kim tate , always.
Kims character was more realistic, she was a bitch who got what she wanted , but she also had class and underneath it all a heart and did care about certain people. Sadie was not as convincing , not really classy and cared about no one but herself. |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: At Home
Posts: 8,538
|
I always loved Kim Tata and never realy liked Sadie King
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,533
|
I much preferred Kim Tate. She was, I thought, a bitch by necessity mainly because Chris Tate was so awful to her rather than just a bitch for the sake of it. She was pretty genuine. Sadie King I didn't like at all and she was a bitch for the sake of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,216
|
Kim tate, definately!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Herts
Posts: 192
|
It would have to be Kim Tate, she was a multi dimension character, superb at playing the baddie but did have a warmer side to her too
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,048
|
100% Kim Tate!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 454
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamArmand
Claire King can ACT. Kim was multi dimensional, Sadie was one note. This is seriously a POINTLESS question.
Since a lot of posters around here are pretty young, i doubt they remember Kim. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:11.



