|
||||||||
LCD connected via coax |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New Forest/ish
Posts: 330
|
LCD connected via coax
Am thinking of upgrading the kitchen/diner 14" CRT to a 23" LCD as we watch a 40% of our TV in there. It will be connected to the Sky box via coax which is in the next room. Got a thought at the back of my mind that this won't give me a decent picture quality (have just been reading about pictalating problems). Am currently looking at a HD ready Philips to keep it "futureproof" but connecting a HD ready TV via coax has been questioning myself (maybe I'm just up to late).. Any thoughts?
Have posted on the sky forum too incase anyone has tried/is doing this already. Last edited by Buelligan : 02-01-2007 at 06:10. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Leeds
Posts: 522
|
Thats a nice LCD. I have noticed there is a 27 inch LCD for about £15 more on ebay. Check into it if you can fit it into your kitchen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,378
|
RF is the lowest quality output ... but obviously it depends on each individual TV and each individual viewer (ie you!) as to whether the quality is good enough or not. We have a similar set up to you (19 inch LCD in kitchen, connected to the SKY+ box via coax) and the picture is acceptable 90% of the time. If you can, try to get a shop to show you a sky picture via Coax and judge it from there.
But, you may want to think about alternatives. Eg video sender, or running the wires for scart/s-VHS connections as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Aberfeldy
Posts: 7,035
|
if you use wf-100 rf cable eg like the sky engineer uses you will get a good enough picture.
its shielded cable and stops if not eliminates intereference. its going to be better than a video sender. its never going to be hd quality but the quality will be acceptable. the only drawback is that crt tv is of a better quality with rf signal but doesnt look as neat as a lcd. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New Forest/ish
Posts: 330
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amazon
I have noticed there is a 27 inch LCD for about £15 more on ebay.
I want to poke it, see it from different angles, know there will be minimum problem If/When anything goes Pete Tong and that the sales people will be telling the truth (ar at least say they don't know) If I ask them a technical question. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New Forest/ish
Posts: 330
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by niall campbell
if you use wf-100 rf cable eg like the sky engineer uses you will get a good enough picture.
its shielded cable and stops if not eliminates intereference. its going to be better than a video sender. its never going to be hd quality but the quality will be acceptable. the only drawback is that crt tv is of a better quality with rf signal but doesnt look as neat as a lcd. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Aberfeldy
Posts: 7,035
|
if you have sky+ you will have a quad lnb
so you will have two spare connections at dish. feed one from there to your kitchen and buy a second hand digibox for freesat. alternatily ( is that how you spell it?) you could get multiview from sky. get sky+ in living room and they will shift your existing box into the kitchen. if you on sports package or films sky+ will be free and multiview £10 per month or a freesat card one off £20 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New Forest/ish
Posts: 330
|
Err. none of the above
Only two of us in the house, we tend to watch the same things so no "I want to watch Driving Miss Bonkers" whilst I watch England loose at "insert ball sport" (mind you when bike racing or Supermoto is on..). Also got a decent HDD/DVR so rarely, If ever need a + box. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:23.

