Mcdreamy I was just hitting out in general.
Originally Posted by 1303:
“You can say that again. I really dont think Eastenders has changed much at all.
Its still an incredibly depressing(even with pauline gone!) and IMO boring soap. In fact its more a "drama" than a soap but a poor drama at that. there are much better dramas on ITV and BBC i would rather wash.
However corrie is completely different - theres wit, humour, good storylines which are generally less predictable and a fair amount of drama yes but it just is not so dam depressing all in all.”
See this is what I mean. I can see from your posts your a clear Corrie fan and take this whole ratings thing very serious. I also see from history your fully anti BBC.

You can talk until the cow come home about repeat ratings but if your to do that lets talk facts. The EE sunday BBC 1 repeat gets between 1 million to 2 million viewer each week and actually unlike someone else said does often get up to 3 million. Go check Barb. The BBC 10pm repeats also get far more than any of the repeats ITV show of Corrie or Emmerdale.
I think generally EE is still in a good position, the writing is good, it does have some iffy episodes but then so does every soap, it's more consistently enjoyable than it was in 2004 and the cast they have now is very good, and the ratings aren't anything to worry about! It's all scare mongering, they're always lower in the summer, the share is mostly solid and decent. As long as it stays between 35 and 45 percent I don't think there's anything to worry about. On Tuesday it only had 7.6 million viewers but it was a 40 percent share of the audience and it was the highest rating of the day.
Ratings are declining year on year but EastEnders is still a very popular programme. I do think the BBC should promote it more cos' I think it deserves the ratings Corrie gets but you have to remember that Corrie has more OAP fans who stick with the show loyally and it seems they are now giving out new adverts and such. Another thing is that Corrie has always had the edge over EE cos its been going for longer, EE always used to be ahead in the BARB ratings cos' they added the omnibus well they dont do that anymore so people assume its ratings have gone down. The truth is yes they havebut no more from the rest.
But it's still a fact that the 10pm repeat and the omnibus are why EE gets less viewers than Corrie. If there wasnt a 10pm repeat then I bet the viewing figures for the episodes would be higher! Enders fans know that there's two fixed repeats, one of which is on terrestrial telly. Yes Corrie has a repeat/omnibus on ITV2 but it's not at a fixeid time, the late night one is always shifting and is sometimes on as late as midnight. The omnibus is more stable and easy to find but the one they have in the morning is on at a bad time.
EE is doing fine in the ratings - factor in the repeat ratings and it comes out on top still. I know people say we shouldnt do that cos its a repeat but at least 80 percent of the viewers are first time viewers. And it's a repeat of osmething that was shown hours earlier and a couple of days earlier, it's not like adding the ratings for a repeat of a 5 year old episode of Vicar of dibley to the original showing etc like some people say it is as an excuse not to do it. The BEEB look at the ratings across several repeat airings whereas ITV rely on the original showing of a show getting good ratings cos they rely on advertising revenue.
Anyway...EE is in a good position.
I know for a fact that the BEEB have 'Enders on guarantee until at least 2012, it isnt going anywhere! It's a very important show for them. Enders has security on the BBC, thats why I wish ITV werent getting Neighbours - they'll ruin it
Last edited by Summa Lovin : 28-04-2007 at 20:31