|
||||||||
Corrie's audience peaks at 13.1! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,048
|
Corrie's audience peaks at 13.1!
This is truly amazing, a big congarts from me to everyone on Corrie! You work really hard and we all obviously really want to watch your brilliant work!
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Thats a great achievement
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,216
|
Well done Corrie cast and Crew
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,875
|
fantastic news. it even beat Mike's death!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,421
|
That's one of the best in years!!! What did Richard Hillman's driving into the canal episode get?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,048
|
Just over 14 I think but that was 4 years ago! So this is fab, it was a huge achievement! I doubt we'll ever see any of the soaps reach these heights agin, unfortunately!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 545
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by D*****
That's one of the best in years!!! What did Richard Hillman's driving into the canal episode get?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 50
|
Ratings are good, shame about the storyline.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,347
|
Fabulous Ratings, Fabulous Storyline and Fabulous characters!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Walford/TARDIS
Posts: 8,620
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RosamundStreet
Just over 14 I think but that was 4 years ago! So this is fab, it was a huge achievement! I doubt we'll ever see any of the soaps reach these heights agin, unfortunately!
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,874
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Filiman
I think its possible. In 2005 EE hit 15m when Chrissie Watts killed Den Watts - and that was only 2 years ago. And later in 2005, when the Mitchell brothers returned to confront Chrissie it hit 14.5m, and that was only just over a year ago. I don't see why CS couldn't hit around 12-13m sometime in 2007 if its good enough. EE may not be able to, as the current characters are not really good enough to warrant that viewership, but CT has not had a mass exodus of established characters so it still has the potential to draw viewers in if the storyline is right, as Tracy & Charlie have demonstrated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Walford/TARDIS
Posts: 8,620
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mitch 123
I'm sure you are wrong about those ratings! I'm almost certain that Eastenders has not got anywhere near 14 million in the last 2 years.
If you look at 2006, EE ratings have been dramatically down most of the year, and has done far worse than 2005. Whilst many may attribute this to a general decline of audiences affecting soap, EE position in relation to Corrie worsened in 2006, compared to its position to Corrie in 2005. In that year, EE quite often beat Corrie, but rarely did so in 2006. If memory serves me right (although on this I could be wrong), episodes of EE were constantly reaching towards the 14m mark in the first few months of 2005, certainly hitting 11m or more a fair few times - have to go and check on the ratings thread. Last edited by Filiman : 19-01-2007 at 19:28. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 13,710
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cillian McCall
Ratings are good, shame about the storyline.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 23,354
|
Congratulations to Corrie! They truly do deserve those ratings, the Tracy/Charlie storyline has kept me hooked to my tv screen! Well done to the cast and crew for developing and acting out this wonderful storyline, Corrie truly deserve these figures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 43
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Filiman
I think its possible. In 2005 EE hit 15m when Chrissie Watts killed Den Watts - and that was only 2 years ago. And later in 2005, when the Mitchell brothers returned to confront Chrissie it hit 14.5m, and that was only just over a year ago. I don't see why CS couldn't hit around 12-13m sometime in 2007 if its good enough. EE may not be able to, as the current characters are not really good enough to warrant that viewership, but CT has not had a mass exodus of established characters so it still has the potential to draw viewers in if the storyline is right, as Tracy & Charlie have demonstrated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Wales
Posts: 2,187
|
well i think it could have if Paulines exit had been on a normal day rather than xmas, the last few years ALL soaps are down on Christmas day, and it still managed 11.52million!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Norwich
Posts: 27,355
|
I can see EE's ratings going up later on this year- they've got a couple of good climax's to come at the minute- Stacey and Max's affair being revealed, Kevin and Shirley's secret being revealed, the outcome of whatever is going to happen to Martin and Sonia. Don't write them off just yet
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Merseyside
Posts: 3,605
|
EE is awful.
Crap characters that fans weirdly obsess about (Bradley and Stacey?). Crap storylines which sound like they've been created by an instituted lunatic. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Norwich
Posts: 27,355
|
I wouldn't say that Billy and Honey's downs syndrome storyline was crap, or the domestic violence storyline with Owen and Denise either. Admittedly there are perhaps a few too many storylines going on at once at the minute and so that means that they aren't dealt with in as much depth as they could be but it doesn't mean that it's crap.
But anyway bottom line is we all have our own individual tastes- some people like EE and some people like Corrie- doesn't make either of us right or wrong- it's just our own personal opinion. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Walford/TARDIS
Posts: 8,620
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rob*123*
Eastenders can surely get 13m if it's got a huge storyline like Corrie had.
Its not a Corrie or an EE thing.... rather, its the nature of character exposure to the wider public. The same thing will inevitably happen to Corrie as well, Corrie just happens to have been lucky in not having lost a large number of established and well known characters in quick succession. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,048
|
Corrie had the same trouble as EE in the early '80s! Strangely at the same age EE is now! Actors eather left or died almost monthly!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 4,994
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pabs1904
EE is awful.
Crap characters that fans weirdly obsess about (Bradley and Stacey?). Crap storylines which sound like they've been created by an instituted lunatic. No justification for the criticism, just "it's crap". Not even a grade G for that one, sonny |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 3,607
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RosamundStreet
Corrie had the same trouble as EE in the early '80s! Strangely at the same age EE is now! Actors eather left or died almost monthly!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North wales
Posts: 534
|
Eastenders lost a lot of there cast when that awful wowem who was working at the soap at the time got rid of roy,barry and all that since then the soap has never been the same again.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:11.

