Deano Wicks worst actor on TV - AXE HIM

3 of 3

Fizzy Dog

31-01-2007

Originally Posted by Sunanda:
“Says who? everywhere I have read has people slating him. I have even sent a letter to the new EP saying how crap Matt is and told him to visit the forums which have people slating him.”

What do you mean "Says who?"
I already said it was apparently what the exec producer thinks

SULLA

31-01-2007

Originally Posted by Candy_floss:
“To be fair, he did the best that could be expected of him. Before that episode most of his scenes seem to have consisted of him lying around on the sofa, he's been used almost as an extra for ages now. How's an actor supossed to develop if their never given any decent scenes to work with? I have to admit some of the facial expressions were abit OTT but I suspect he's picked that up from his scenes with Kevin
However considering all the dramatic scenes Matt's had to do recently he's doing great and improving all the time ”

Since when has the UK's No 3 soap been a training ground for potential actors. The public deserve the finished article and he's nowhere near

Mags31

31-01-2007

deano hasnt been my favourite but he was excellent on tuesday nights episode i hope he keeps the good acting up. I dont think its down to the viewers to decide if he gets axed if it was then so many other soap stars in all the other different soaps would of been axed years ago.

Rysen

31-01-2007

Originally Posted by Fizzy Dog:
“What do you mean "Says who?"
I already said it was apparently what the exec producer thinks ”

The poster you are replying to, from what I've seen, has been doing this all over the threads. He seems to despise everything EE but doesn't stay out of the EE threads. I'm guessing it's deliberate.

If the producer is happy with his work at the moment and is willing to give him difficult storylines then let him do his job. Matt D can act imo.

The show's low recent ratings will not be down to Deano Wicks alone....if at all, seeing as he is very popular, regardless of who comes on here and slags him off.
Last edited by Rysen : 31-01-2007 at 21:46

Rysen

31-01-2007

Originally Posted by SULLA:
“Since when has the UK's No 3 soap been a training ground for potential actors. The public deserve the finished article and he's nowhere near”

Number 3?

Candy_floss

31-01-2007

Originally Posted by SULLA:
“Since when has the UK's No 3 soap been a training ground for potential actors. The public deserve the finished article and he's nowhere near”

I'm not saying it is but doesn't he at least deserves credit for showing some improvement? On the basis of this improvement I don't think he deserves to be axed, he should have the chance to show what he can do.
Like I said he hasn't had the best of storylines and he can only work with what he's been given. That's just my opinion...

Rysen

31-01-2007

Originally Posted by Candy_floss:
“I'm not saying it is but doesn't he at least deserves credit for showing some improvement? On the basis of this improvement I don't think he deserves to be axed, he should have the chance to show what he can do.
Like I said he hasn't had the best of storylines and he can only work with what he's been given. That's just my opinion...”

It's a good one.

Candy_floss

31-01-2007

Originally Posted by Rysen:
“It's a good one.”

Thank you

Rysen

31-01-2007

You are welcome.

Mags31

31-01-2007

well said

James T Kirk.

31-01-2007

Originally Posted by Sunanda:
“Who agrees?”

I think thats a little harsh as he is relatively young and personally there is actors worse than him and I think he is an exceptional actor.

Kargo

31-01-2007

was there a need for that? im sorry but i think thats just plain cruel. this is someone's Job at the end of the day, you have to think of it like that

Its just the same as maybe me going to your boss and writing them a letter saying how bad i think you are at your job.

you must have a lot of free time if you sit writing letters to producers

Last edited by Kargo : 31-01-2007 at 22:14

DS Forum Support

31-01-2007

'Axing' threads are not tolerated. They merely incite argument upon argument and are unconstructive to say the least.

3 of 3