Quote:
“Originally posted by Alzapiedi
Does anyone know how much of an improved picture/sound you would get using the deoyxgenated/gold/expensive scart leads? ”
Having looked at a few of these, I'm not really convinced there's much difference. It's like with audio cables - the difference between a £2 and a £20 cable is more than the difference between a £20 and a £200 cable (if you can find one that expensive, I'm sure they'd sell you one if you wanted it

).
On the point of s-video vs. RGB connected SCART, it can depend to a certain amount on your TV (s-video carries chrominance and luminance separately, RGB connected SCART carries (obviously) red green and blue separately - your TV may have to convert the RGB to chrominance and luminance, it may have to convert the chrominance and luminance to RGB, depends how it works internally). But on the vast majority of TVs, with a good quality (i.e. gold connections, oxygen free cable) lead, SCART or S-Video would be nearly indistingusishable.
Someone mentioned component video - this is like S-Video in that chrominance and luminance are separated, but then the chrominance is again separated into two further channels which should give theoretically the best possible quality on TVs that use those signals as the driving signals for the tube (I think all american ones do - as do most video projectors, not sure about UK/PAL TVs, some may use RGB). As there is less converters required between signal source and the display, this would give the best possible quality.
Mark