Originally Posted by AgingRocker:
“Oh poor poor Tara, if only I had had all the chances she did ...
And without necessarily having a good voice, anyone that can play a musical instrument reasonably well ought to have a basic ability to hold a note.
It just goes to show that if you can get yourself in the papers often enough you can be a star without actually doing anything. She might be more refined and so on, but she's no more use than Jade Goody, or a chocolate fireguard...”
Just because someone has a wealthy upbringing, it doesn't render them immune from the emotions we all feel. Money is great, yes, and we would all like to have it, but it's not the be all and end all of happiness. I could have all the money in the world and not have to worry about material things but you can still be lonely or insecure (more so sometimes as people with money never know if someone likes them for that reason or because of themselves).
As for the theory that someone who can play a musical instrument should also be able to sing, well, that doesn't follow at all. The voice is an instrument, too. Numerous composers of the 20th century have been able to play piano brilliantly without being able to hold a note physically, and do you think all musicians in orchestras can also sing well? What would be the odds of that?
And it works the other way too. How many wonderful singers do you think can also play instruments? Yes, some can (singer/songwriters); but not all of them. Musicality comes in all forms. I can dance really well. Doesn't mean I can sing too or play a musical instrument (I can't).
You're confusing being utterly tone deaf (which obviously musicians aren't) with having a good, strong voice which is capable of making songs sound beautiful (or sometimes, in some cases, overblown! Citing no examples here of course ...

). The two are totally different. Tara also has no confidence in her voice, so that doesn't help.