|
||||||||
What a Joke |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#76 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,744
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mossy2103
Nothing at all iffy - it's what the public wanted, for a number of reasons known only to "the public that voted". Some of those reasons are evident in some of the threads here (he was boring, always morose, never smiled etc). Indeed, it was only in the last few days that we saw a different Shaun, but by then I think that it was too late.
Was it really a 'different Shaun' that you saw or was it that they decided to allow you to see a different picture of him than before by showing you different edits? (He was shown to be boring. he was shown to be morose, shown to never smile) It doesn't necesarily mean that's what he's like all the time. Nothing wrong with saying that people voted based on what they were shown, but I don't think you can assume that what people were shown necessarily sums him up accurately as an individual by saying 'he was this', and 'he was that'. They control what you see. Last edited by Alrightmate : 17-03-2007 at 16:58. |
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 68,698
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alrightmate
Yes, that you saw.
Was it really a 'different Shaun' that you saw or was it that they decided to allow you to see a different picture of him than before by showing you different edits?
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,744
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mossy2103
I was watching the live feeds, so it WAS a different Shaun
![]() Watching Shaun 24 hours a day were you? The camera was on Shaun all the time was it? |
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,471
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mossy2103
So its' third-hand (or fourth-hand) information, not witnessed directly, passed down from people who might (and I emphasise the word might) have ulterior motives or an axe to grind. Not compelling evidence in my book.
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 68,698
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alrightmate
Oh, the winking smiley that indicates that somebody is in on the know.
Watching Shaun 24 hours a day were you? The camera was on Shaun all the time was it? The newer Shaun also came across with his acceptance that he needed to do something about his hands, make his performance more natural. I take your point though about careful editing, but the live feeds did show a different approach in the final few days. |
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 68,698
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by diyqueen
how can it be 3rd hand my sil is the waitress she won't move for.
You originally said Quote:
my sil used to work for a big house in Suffolk the owners off this house are very friendly with the whole PT family
Now this "sil" (??) IS the waitress.Quite frankly, I find this a bit "unbelievable" that you have such apparent close connections with the family (people have been known to spin a yarn, to kid people on you know .I will leave it there thank you very much. Last edited by mossy2103 : 17-03-2007 at 17:54. |
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sandhurst
Posts: 1,402
|
In the end Shaun might have had the better voice but Tara had the personality and stage presence...nothing iffy about that
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Yorkshire Wolds
Posts: 9,784
|
Another joke. Ray seemed to have recovered wonderfully from his "man flu" sorry upper respitory infection as he performed as usual on BBC2 football results this evening. What a guy.
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 43,548
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jos
Another joke. Ray seemed to have recovered wonderfully from his "man flu" sorry upper respitory infection as he performed as usual on BBC2 football results this evening. What a guy.
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 68,698
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lulu g
Indeed. One might even think that all he'd had was the common cold.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 43,548
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mossy2103
Which is probably what he had - after all, it was described on CFA as an upper-respiratory tract infection (NOT the flu).
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 12,904
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lulu g
Indeed. One might even think that all he'd had was the common cold.
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 68,698
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lulu g
Well, yes, that was my point. It sounds so much more serious than if you just call it a cold, doesn't it?
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:04.
