|
||||||||
Corrie ~ Wednesday 28th March |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#101 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,504
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by naz65
Why them??????????
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#102 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,504
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by coda
Ken hasn't exactly a 'poker face' has he! I hope the prosecution didn't notice him rolling his eyes...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#103 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,200
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vonnee
Tracey wasn't always evil - there was a time she was quite sweet - it would have been when she was, oh, about 9 or thereabouts
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#104 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,360
|
The prosecution had already established that Tracy had no marks on her except the two minor cuts on both sides of her hands. So why didn`t they ask her why as a woman who had been battered by her boyfriend to the point that she was leaving him she didn`t have a single bruise on her body.
I have always thought that the weakness in Tracy`s story is that she only lived with Charlie for 6 months, not long compared to women who have killed in desparation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#105 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,823
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rosieeee
well they set the example to Traceeeeey - so it must be their fault
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#106 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Weatherfield
Posts: 25,938
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrbernay
Guess we'll have to wait for Friday when she takes the stand for this enigma to be solved
![]() Or now.... Friday's Episode |
|
|
|
|
|
#107 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: By the Sea
Posts: 24,199
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by naz65
Did you see the most of the jury's face when tracy couldn't hold the statue with one hand, it was quite bad that, she was kind of caught out there me thinks
Apparently, a mother lifted up a 10 ton truck to save her young child, yet couldn't open a jar normally. |
|
|
|
|
|
#108 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: By the Sea
Posts: 24,199
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rosieeee
didn't she say that Tracy was her daughter and Charlie was an evil man - and if she wasn't on her daughters side that meant she was on his?
I'm getting dizzy now
|
|
|
|
|
|
#109 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,823
|
well she takes the stand on friday, wonder if she tells the truth or if she lies for her, there might be a twist
|
|
|
|
|
|
#110 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,994
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by naz65
well she takes the stand on friday, wonder if she tells the truth or if she lies for her, there might be a twist
|
|
|
|
|
|
#111 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,823
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Messenger
Not a twist in her neck I hope.
LOL, no I hope not what do you think will tracy get of or go down? |
|
|
|
|
|
#112 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,994
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by naz65
LOL, no I hope not
what do you think will tracy get of or go down? |
|
|
|
|
|
#113 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,823
|
Yeah, I want her to be gulity, but I have a feeling she will get off
|
|
|
|
|
|
#114 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Now fully retired
Posts: 3,056
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by naz65
Yeah, I want her to be gulity, but I have a feeling she will get off
|
|
|
|
|
|
#115 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 38,853
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by naz65
Yeah, I want her to be gulity, but I have a feeling she will get off
Tomorrow night Deirdre tells Toxic's solicitor the truth, that Toxic deliberately killed Charlie and made up the abuse story. she tells Toxic she's disgusted with her. She spends her life defending victims of real abuse. To which she gets a typical Toxic response. I think if she was found not guilty even she would complain about it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#116 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 38,853
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by naz65
well she takes the stand on friday, wonder if she tells the truth or if she lies for her, there might be a twist
![]() Friday's episode: http://www.itv.com/page.asp?partid=507 |
|
|
|
|
|
#117 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 5,423
|
Surely in real life if a defendant confesses her guilt to a barrister then they are duty bound to resign from the case. Anyone know?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#118 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 428
|
I know people slag off Kate Ford but she wss brilliant last night. I'm going to miss Tracy.
Can't warm to the Mortons at all. They feel out of place. |
|
|
|
|
|
#119 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Now fully retired
Posts: 3,056
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by peaches41
Surely in real life if a defendant confesses her guilt to a barrister then they are duty bound to resign from the case. Anyone know?
"Yes, m' lud, but I had the runs"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#120 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: up a gumtree
Posts: 18,284
|
Why can't Ken say he wants to give evidence if Dierdre won't?
(or won't tell the truth) The your side/Charlie's side thing - at the very end of Monday night's episode Tracy said to Dierdre, when she said she was on her side but wouldn't lie, "Charlie was an evil man, and you're not on my side, you're on his." Probably not exact words, but that was what Dierdre repeated back last night. Could mean anything, she's probably realised that Tracey is more evil than Charlie was. If Tracy said she was worried about waking Amy, why did she say twice, in answer to questions that she could hear her crying upstairs? Last edited by lumpbottom : 29-03-2007 at 10:33. |
|
|
|
|
|
#121 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,994
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by naz65
When is david Platt taking to the stand
What do you reckon? |
|
|
|
|
|
#122 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Grace Bros
Posts: 696
|
I thought Kate Ford really raised her game in last night's episode. She was thoroughly confince IMO and I will be very sad to see her go.
I'm really looking forward to David taking the witness stand. He's bound to be a cocky little s**t.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#123 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 276
|
I think it has to be a guilty verdict. The whole no-blood-on-the-ornament thing is overwhelming. Presumably there are fingerprints on there from both hands (?) and she obviously couldn't wield it with one hand. And even if she could, it would make no sense to actually do that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#124 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Now fully retired
Posts: 3,056
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Messenger
If David gets caughts out lying on the stand do you think he'll be charged with perjury? He could also be charged with perverting the course of justice.
What do you reckon? edited to add: perhaps Tracy could be prosecuted instead for encouraging his perjury. Last edited by chestfield : 29-03-2007 at 11:00. |
|
|
|
|
|
#125 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,994
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chestfield
at 16? he's still a minor in the eyes of the law.
edited to add: perhaps Tracy could be prosecuted instead for encouraging his perjury. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:59.




