Originally Posted by
The Prumeister:
“How on earth was someone like Rory selected for the show? He was insufferably pathetic, had no leadership skills, no people skills and seemed as thick as a plank. His style veered between unnecessarily autocratic and bumbling incompetent.
I did feel a twinge of sympathy at the end - fleetingly - but I'm seriously questioning the selection process for this programme. Is this really la creme de la creme of British business
”
I think we've already seen that all the kerfuffle over Surallan criticising the calibre of contestants and saying that this year's lot are improved was probably just PR flannel.
Think about the people we know are employed by Sugar; Nick and Margaret who are the very definition of imperturbable, Tim from series one who was unfailingly calm and polite, and blonde whatsherface from series 2 who was largely invisible until the very end.
The ones we remember, who made the show and kept people watching, are Paul and Sara, Syed and the Badger. Loud, argumentative, challenging , insubordinate, and chosen for their screen appeal rather than business appeal.
I felt quite sorry for Andy last week when Adrian Chiles tried to console him "remember you are a winner, you made the sixteen out of 50 thousand applicants" or whatever the figure was. Yes he made the 16, but was it because he was potential Amstrad material or because he'd give us all a good laugh as he crashed and burned.