DS Forums

 
 

Plasma TV and Radio channels from Sky


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-04-2007, 10:14
singh100
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 37

This may sound like a silly question. But everywhere I go people I saying that should not buy a plasma tv beacuse of screen burn etc.
I was just thinking if had a plasma tv and left it on one of the radio channels on sky tv e.g. radio1 radio 2 etc would this cause Screen burn.
At the moment I have a crt tv and normally during the day I just leave my sky box on radio 1, but if I had a plasma would it be more of a problem
singh100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 05-04-2007, 10:29
Richard46
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: London
Posts: 41,718
Use the problem as an excuse to treat yourself to a nice A/V sound system; run an audio out straight from the Digibox to it and you can turn the TV off.
Richard
Richard46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2007, 14:34
hardeep
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 2,163
Originally Posted by singh100
This may sound like a silly question. But everywhere I go people I saying that should not buy a plasma tv beacuse of screen burn etc.
I was just thinking if had a plasma tv and left it on one of the radio channels on sky tv e.g. radio1 radio 2 etc would this cause Screen burn.
At the moment I have a crt tv and normally during the day I just leave my sky box on radio 1, but if I had a plasma would it be more of a problem

Not really an issue. I leave my plasma on 5Live for hours at a time without issue - remember that the the radio channels have a deliberately dimmer picture for this reason.

However I do agree with the A/V solution idea - if you have Sky+ many movies are broadcast in surround sound.

PS screenburn can be a problem on CRTs as well - my 7 year old Grundig widescreen now has faint lines due to 4:3 to 16:9 switching. (Fortunately the plasma fills in the blank part of the screen in 4:3 mode.)
hardeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2007, 15:56
Nigel Goodwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,789
The screen burn 'problem' is mostly when new, and it's due to the rapid fading of the display for the first few months - biggest problem would be watching in 4:3 mode, where the outside edges wouldn't fade as they aren't being used. Once it's six months old, and had reasonable use, it shouldn't be a problem.
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2007, 15:02
reddog1234
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: South East UK
Posts: 2,096
I wouldn't even bother worrying about burn-in on a new plasma. It was only really a problem with early plasmas.

I have an early plasma... never taken any notice and no sign of burn-in or all the other mumbo jumbo you hear about plasmas... of course your miles may vary.
reddog1234 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2007, 13:17
Tony Boman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Church Crookham, Hampshire
Posts: 137
I was a bit worried by all the screen burn / image retention horror stories, but I have had no such problems on my Pioneer PDP-427XD. Only had it 3 weeks and problem is supposed to be worse on new screens, but so far so good. My kids have been off for Easter and have been watching music and kids channels with fixed logos for hours on end, and I still have not had a problem.

From what I have learned from many forum threads is that Image retention is more likely with new plasmas these days than real screen burn. Image retention tends to be short term retention of a previously displayed image appearing on the current displayed image. Screen burn is an image that will never disappear, where as image retention fades eventually. By all means correct me if I am wrong.

So far, I do not seem to have had a problem with image retention.

If a salesman tells you that LCDs are better than Plasmas because of plasma screen burn, they are not keeping up with new technology or they work for Dixons! Base your buying decisions on what you see, not out of date information. I will not get into the LCD vs Plasma debate, but let's say I based my choice on actually viewing the two technologies.

I totally agree to run the sound through an A/V amp, because it will sound great, not for fear of screen burn.
Tony Boman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2007, 14:29
Catbed
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cheshire, Winter Hill TX
Posts: 339
I wouldn't use our plasma TV for radio simply for the cost (and environmental) aspects - it uses 300+ watts
Catbed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2007, 14:51
Nitram
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Urmston, Manchester
Posts: 343
Originally Posted by Tony Boman
they are not keeping up with new technology or they work for Dixons!
Same difference, isn't it?!
Nitram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2007, 15:16
Tony Boman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Church Crookham, Hampshire
Posts: 137
Originally Posted by Catbed
I wouldn't use our plasma TV for radio simply for the cost (and environmental) aspects - it uses 300+ watts
Fair point, I try to forget my TV's environmental footprint
Tony Boman is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:11.