|
||||||||
Should the next Doctor be female? |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The Orchid Station
Posts: 2,661
|
No. I think that the problem with this is that
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Derby
Posts: 27,577
|
It could easily work but it could be a disaster for any actress who takes the role as the level of scrutiny would probably be considerable.
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 805
|
I dunno, I reckon a female Doctor could work if she was naturally both authoritative and witty...
I give you... Joanna Lumley! |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The dark side of the moon
Posts: 51,357
|
No, a female doctor wouldn't work. The Doctor is a male character.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: GL51 0EX
Posts: 14,088
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Wizard
I have already said to my friends that I would love to see a female doctor.
... Therefore there's always a possibility that there can be a female Timelord existing in another dimention. That could be explained and would make a good next series. ... The canonicity of this (given that it was in the 2006 annual), is unclear however, so he could always change his mind. I have to say, if there is to be a female in the role, I'd rather it was as Romana than the Doctor, maybe killing him off at the end of his regenerations, and having Romana replace him. Personally the only way I think we'll see a female doctor however, is if Billy takes on the role. And the love sick doc regenerates into her image. |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 805
|
gawd, I think I've seen more than enough of Billie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 824
|
no
if there are male and female timelords why would the species need to mutate? unless its like the frogs in Jurassic Park I think that the series should end when he can no longer regenerate |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,689
|
Doctor Who should be played by a pizza.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 878
|
I think that if The Doctor was played by a woman it would bring a bit of gender confusion to the character, youve seen the male doctor get close to women, what would the doctor do if he turned into a she?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,106
|
I couldn't think of a quicker way to kill the show stone dead, even the hardcore Whovians who wouldn't let the show die and whom RTD admits he takes for granted would switch off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,575
|
No, no, no, no, no, no, no.
The Doctor is a male. Unless he goes to the NHS and has a sex change, he will stay a male. |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,575
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by snow_garden
no
if there are male and female timelords why would the species need to mutate? unless its like the frogs in Jurassic Park I think that the series should end when he can no longer regenerate Apparently, it has been said in previous Dr Who's, that the Dr can only regenerate 13 times. And then you get that silly Christopher Eccleston, who decides to waste his opportunity, and only play him for one series. Thing is though, he said he didn't want to be typecast, but I'll always think of him as Dr Who now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 1984
Posts: 7,100
|
she would never be able to park the tardis in a small space and want to take it to Sainsburys for her "big" shop
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Up in the sky
Posts: 1,546
|
I can't beleive that this thread and debate is still going. I will add my voice to this (although I still think this is the wrong time to do this at the beginning of a new season - oh well). There is no reason why you can't have a female Doctor. You could mess up everything and it would not be as good but you could do it. However by the same reason we could make Miss Marple a man Mr Marple, Superman becomes a woman, as does Spiderman and Batman. Wonderwoman becomes Wonderman
. James Bond to Jennie Bond. Turn Mr Darcy into a woman and Elizabeth Bennent into a man, ok it flys in the face of what was happening in the day into a joke and destroys Jane Austin's writing but so what. We could go on and on. My point is, of course, we can change the sex of long established characters but at the cost of the beleivability of the character in question. Doctor Who is you might think easier to get away with because he (she) can regenerate but it has been quite clearly established that he is a male Time Lord and there are (or were) female Time Lords. You could add new elements to the story to explain changes of sex of course but this would leave so many unresolved issues and be far to complex to explain in a family show that none or very few could ever be resolved. Time Lords mating habits for example. Shudder at the thought. There is of course a middle way. How about a TV series or comic strip about a female Time Lady - Romana for example. They did it for Superwoman, Batgirl etc. Just a thought. I hope my reasons against a female Doctor are valid and explain why I hope it will never happen. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 4,094
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tegan Jovanka
I can't beleive that this thread and debate is still going. I will add my voice to this (although I still think this is the wrong time to do this at the beginning of a new season - oh well). There is no reason why you can't have a female Doctor. You could mess up everything and it would not be as good but you could do it. However by the same reason we could make Miss Marple a man Mr Marple, Superman becomes a woman, as does Spiderman and Batman. Wonderwoman becomes Wonderman
. James Bond to Jennie Bond. Turn Mr Darcy into a woman and Elizabeth Bennent into a man, ok it flys in the face of what was happening in the day into a joke and destroys Jane Austin's writing but so what. We could go on and on. My point is, of course, we can change the sex of long established characters but at the cost of the beleivability of the character in question. Doctor Who is you might think easier to get away with because he (she) can regenerate but it has been quite clearly established that he is a male Time Lord and there are (or were) female Time Lords. You could add new elements to the story to explain changes of sex of course but this would leave so many unresolved issues and be far to complex to explain in a family show that none or very few could ever be resolved. Time Lords mating habits for example. Shudder at the thought. There is of course a middle way. How about a TV series or comic strip about a female Time Lady - Romana for example. They did it for Superwoman, Batgirl etc. Just a thought. I hope my reasons against a female Doctor are valid and explain why I hope it will never happen. |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,575
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tegan Jovanka
James Bond to Jennie Bond.
(Or, maybe she is the female 007?! )
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Up in the sky
Posts: 1,546
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jen0607
Yeah, think the Beeb's old royal correspondent might have something to say about that!
(Or, maybe she is the female 007?! )
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Up in the sky
Posts: 1,546
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Slug
Your reasons are totally valid and exactly the ones I used the last time I made a sensible contribution to to a thread on this subject.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: St Albans
Posts: 4,582
|
At the end of the day we have all grown up knowing that despite all the regenerations the Doctor is always actualy the same person under everything, that that person is male. There may be precedent to allow this to happen as far as the Who universe is concerned but changes need to take the fans with them and I just don't think the fans would believe a female Doctor.
Lets have as many female timelords as you like but not the Doctor himself. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Up in the sky
Posts: 1,546
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarat
At the end of the day we have all grown up knowing that despite all the regenerations the Doctor is always actualy the same person under everything, that that person is male. There may be precedent to allow this to happen as far as the Who universe is concerned but changes need to take the fans with them and I just don't think the fans would believe a female Doctor.
Lets have as many female timelords as you like but not the Doctor himself. |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 4,094
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tegan Jovanka
Quite agree. The Rani was great for example and gave the Master a good run for his money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Up in the sky
Posts: 1,546
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Slug
Unfortunately the only thing I remember about the Rani is her Bonnie Langford impression!
![]() Last edited by Tegan Jovanka : 12-04-2007 at 13:35. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:25.




. James Bond to Jennie Bond. Turn Mr Darcy into a woman and Elizabeth Bennent into a man, ok it flys in the face of what was happening in the day into a joke and destroys Jane Austin's writing but so what. We could go on and on.