|
||||||||
Anyone else appalled by the kissograms? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 10,460
|
Anyone else appalled by the kissograms?
God this made my stomach turn... That Kristina couldn't wait to get stuck in could she!
What did anyone else think? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Central Perk
Posts: 1,591
|
Just shows how desperate they were im surprised they didnt offer sir alan one
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bermingum
Posts: 3,174
|
If i was a woman i'd be appalled they lowered themselves, as a man i'd be appalled if some of them kissed me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bermingum
Posts: 3,174
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ben93
Just shows how desperate they were im surprised they didnt offer sir alan one
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,376
|
This is why Naomi should have been fired. Jadine was dead against it, and so - I think - was Gerri. Naomi was in charge, admitted it was tacky and still sanctioned it. Gerri did not make enough of this fact. Naomi was a very weak leader and her weakness resulted in her team basically selling themselves for cash. How AS allowed her to stay is incredible to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,446
|
reminicent of last series when the girls threw themselves at the fruit market to get free stuf...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 132
|
I was disgusted! Kristina should have been summarily fired, even though she wasn't selected to go to the boardroom. They said themselves that they made more money by selling their bodies than face painting.
I only realised later that the guys had a van. Given the leafy suburb that Richmond is, I would have visited houses offering to remove any unwanted junk, like in garages and lofts. You could charge for this, and probably have sold whatever was cleared to make more money. That sort of business could have gone on into the night. Gardening is a back breaker for too little money, and they weren't skilled at it. Face painting is never going to rake in much cash - it's usually done at fete's to raise charity money isn't it? From early on, the half of the girls could have been selling the idea of running a karaoke for a pub, in return for a cut of the bar take. Didn't the Scottish asian girl look dreadful in the face paint? She's a dish without it though. I haven't seen her contributing yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 21,366
|
Perspicacity
Spoiler
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,899
|
From what I saw they weren't exactly 'kissing' the blokes anyway, I don't see what the problem is at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Midlands
Posts: 960
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Swampster
This is why Naomi should have been fired. Jadine was dead against it, and so - I think - was Gerri. Naomi was in charge, admitted it was tacky and still sanctioned it. Gerri did not make enough of this fact. Naomi was a very weak leader and her weakness resulted in her team basically selling themselves for cash. How AS allowed her to stay is incredible to me.
Without meaning to be cruel, it's blatantly obvious why Gerri and Jadine would have been against the idea and it had nothing to do with morals, etc . How can I put it nicely? They weren't likely to be the biggest earners, were they? However, by that stage, I would have done anything Jadine was opposed to just to nark her. I couldn't see what was wrong with it. Comparing it to prostitution is far too strong even if the girls had been dealing out full blown snogs (and if I was appalled at anything it was Sir A's remark) but they weren't, they were giving pecks on cheeks and hugs. What has happened to so many people's sense of humour in this country? The right person went. I was surprised not to see Gerri go the first week. She made the same mistake again as in the when she also picked the wrong location but that time had managed to talk her way out of it. I wasn't surprised she didn't get a third chance. Last edited by Nurse Betty : 12-04-2007 at 12:13. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 16,500
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nurse Betty
Without meaning to be cruel, it's blatantly obvious why Gerri and Jadine would have been against the idea and it had nothing to do with morals, etc . How can I put it nicely? They weren't likely to be the biggest earners, were they?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 30,158
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavetheScot
Tastes differ, though. Personally I find Jadine very attractive.
She's the anti-Trisha.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,376
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nurse Betty
Naomi was against it as you say to begin with.
Without meaning to be cruel, it's blatantly obvious why Gerri and Jadine would have been against the idea and it had nothing to do with morals, etc . How can I put it nicely? They weren't likely to be the biggest earners, were they? Do you believe that all women who sell their 'favours' are pretty - or even that the most successful ones are? Speaking for myself, I would not have been comfortable walking up to strangers offering kisses for cash. I don't know if that makes me ugly or humourless, but I don't believe that selling snogs is the kind of 'entrepreneurial spirit' that The Apprentice is supposed to be fostering - it seems a bit more 'rag week' to me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: London
Posts: 5,415
|
I also agree Naomi deserved to be fired for allowing that. Kisses for a pound... even if they had won the task on that basis it would have been a hollow victory. There is no business acumen involved at all.
That Kristina had no problem giving a kiss for £1. I wonder what would she do for £100,000 p.a. eh? She comes across as (sorry to be harsh, but) a bit of a s**g to be honest! Last edited by diary_room : 12-04-2007 at 12:26. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,170
|
Yes, I think Jadine is good-looking too.
Think the 'taking rubbish away' is *excellent* - most of us have got stuff in the shed/attic we keep meaning to take to the dump and never get round to - and as you say, there's the option of selling it on! Perspic - you should be The Apprentice! |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: In my Opinion
Posts: 10,057
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nurse Betty
...Without meaning to be cruel, it's blatantly obvious why Gerri and Jadine would have been against the idea and it had nothing to do with morals, etc. How can I put it nicely? They weren't likely to be the biggest earners, were they?...
That wasn't at all 'obvious' to me. And to disprove your theory, Natalie was being properly groped, no problem. Nuff said! Last edited by Sweet FA : 12-04-2007 at 12:44. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: London
Posts: 5,415
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nurse Betty
Naomi was against it as you say to begin with.
Without meaning to be cruel, it's blatantly obvious why Gerri and Jadine would have been against the idea and it had nothing to do with morals, etc . How can I put it nicely? They weren't likely to be the biggest earners, were they? |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 5,992
|
They hardly had lots of good ideas though did they?
I value a bad decision based on the alternatives avaliable and those against it were hardly coming up with better ideas. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: In my Opinion
Posts: 10,057
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perspicacity
...I only realised later that the guys had a van. Given the leafy suburb that Richmond is, I would have visited houses offering to remove any unwanted junk, like in garages and lofts. You could charge for this, and probably have sold whatever was cleared to make more money. That sort of business could have gone on into the night...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 482
|
As long as the local council tip will allow vans. A lot of them don't...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bermingum
Posts: 3,174
|
I think Jadine is attractive too, hmm the anti-Trisha now that is an interesting fantasy - i mean thought!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 482
|
OK. Got this from the Richmond Council site... Quote:
Is there a fee for recycling waste at Townmead Road? They charge £50 a ton with a £10 minimum if it's not your own waste.If you are a resident of the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames, there is no fee involved in recycling your own domestic and household waste at Townmead Road Re-use and Recycling Centre. If you are driving a van, you need to show proof of your residence through a valid drivers licence and council tax statement, (utility bills are not accepted as proof of address). If driving a hire van, a hire agreement will need to be shown. What waste is chargeable? Any waste that is from a business or was related to a business Waste not from your own residential home Any waste you are delivering on behalf of any other person All builders waste that you have not produced Any waste in a van from outside the London Borough of Richmond. However, Quote:
We are no longer allowed to accept the following waste from Traders at this facility: Not as straightforward as it appears....
All types of fridges/freezers – including (household types), televisions and computer monitors, fluorescent tubes, wood containing dangerous substances, chemicals such as paint, pesticides solvents etc, waste engine oil, lead acid batteries, tyres and all types of asbestos. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bermingum
Posts: 3,174
|
To be honest they needed to just make money, if they ended up with a van full of crap afterwards then so what, worry about that tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: London
Posts: 4,818
|
Last year, the girls won the first task but ASA was unhappy about it because they used sex appeal to sell fruits, but they got away with it eventually after Jo and her big mouth forced them to have the treat.
But, now, SAS allowed to actually peck the lads in the public for money, with is more than just sex appeal. Last edited by DomesticGoddess : 12-04-2007 at 13:16. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 30,110
|
Undeniably tacky, but it was at least done with a sense of humour. It was hardly taking them off down a back alley and stricking their tongues down old mens throats.
I think Sir Alan made his decision based on potential. Gerri had done nothing in the first three tasks, but Naomi (at least according to her team) had worked well in previous tasks. Jadine also has some potential, although I think she would have been fired were she not good entertainment. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:57.



