Originally Posted by Socha:
“Is kissing someone (on the cheek mostly) an "act or practice of engaging in sexual activity for money or its equivalent" as is a defnition of prostitution?
Are people that deliver kiss-o-grams prostitutes?
But I agree Dante Ameche, is that really all they could come up with?”
“Is kissing someone (on the cheek mostly) an "act or practice of engaging in sexual activity for money or its equivalent" as is a defnition of prostitution?
Are people that deliver kiss-o-grams prostitutes?
But I agree Dante Ameche, is that really all they could come up with?”
The point is, by calling themselves kissograms, the girls were actually being rather coy. A kissogram - to my knowledge, anyway - is a man or woman, usually dressed in a costume, who is hired in advance to surprise someone celebrating a special occasion. They usually sing a little song and give the recipient a kiss at the end - a bit like a human birthday card. Some are raunchier than others, but on the whole the emphasis is on the performance and surprise element, rather than the kiss.
The girls' team weren't being kissograms at all: they were propositioning men on the spot for a very mild sexual service. We can all debate about the morality of working as a prostitute: whether full sex is 'bad' but a hand job is acceptable; or whether interaction with the male member is immoral, but kissing's fine - even with a bit of a bum feel thrown in for free. Personally, I find it disappointing that this kind of business is the best these apparently high-flying business women could manage.




