Originally Posted by ewan wilson:
“All this is true, Alice.
I just wonder if ALW has a clue about the type of Daniel he really wants on this coming run. Also there were the questions, weren't there about the sexuality of the chosen Joseph, remember? Could it be possible ALW was afraid it'd somehow dent the attraction of his production if the new Joseph turned out to be less than straight and that ALW suspected Dan might be so(however unfounded)? Frankly I don't think folk would care a tinker's curse about the sexual leanings of the lead nowadays. And anyway, Daniel is anything but 'camp', and a lot more virlie seeming than some of the remaining fellows!! And if some of his fellow males fall for him that's hardly his fault..well, not in this context, anyway!! Daniel is an innocent...and the perfect casting for Joseph.”
I've not heard anything about the sexuality of the chosen Joseph being in question! Where was that? Surely it wouldn't make any difference
If I was going to say anyone was camp, I think ALW himself gives Graham Norton a run for his money (lol).....
Any man who has creative leanings is immediately suspected of being less than straight which doesn't always follow -but whether Daniel is or isn't (and he's definitely not camp) I don't think matters. I really cannot see that ALW would be selective on that basis - surely not
Daniel is very talented - he's wonderful to listen to - and watch - and no doubt appeals to everyone on both sides so to speak! Since most of us will never be lucky enough to even have dinner with him I don't suppose it really matters - we'll just keep on dreaming and looking forward to being able to see him in as many shows as possible (and although Tellyaddict disagrees with me ... I think a bit of TV and film work too- if that's lucrative he can then pick and choose his theatre roles)