Originally Posted by MelW:
“I don't know - I don't think he'd say that if he knew he was definitely leaving. I do realise though that he doesn't say he is staying, just that he would like to and there is still a chance that DTC will disagree that he should stay. It would be an interesting (and daring) move to have him stay. However realistic it is that he isn't convicted I think most viewers would want to see him punished in some way so even if he stays on it may well only be for another 6 months/a year until he is punished for his crime in some other way.
I still wish they hadn't made him a rapist though - I can't say I've enjoyed the storyline much.”
If they had done it the right way, it might just have been okay. I was telling a friend of mine about the October 6th episode and when I described the attack I deliberately phrased it as "Linda is shocked when an obsessed/infatuated Dean comes into the kitchen and starts seducing her. She struggles to stay loyal to her husband Mick and Dean loses control of himself and rapes her" mainly because I think that's how it should have been played, with him being more drunk than he was and maybe kissing her on the lips, drunkenly trying to seduce her, professing his love for her and her saying "But I love Mick. I'm married to Mick" - similar to Sean/Tanya though obviously Sean did not rape Tanya and then it cutting away and then him stroking her hair/kissing her on the forehead and saying "Don't worry. I won't tell anyone we slept together/about our one night stand and then continued with the delusional angle and Dean telling Shirley that he kissed her and "one thing led to another" or saying he couldn't remember/Linda didn't mean it if and when Shirley asked if Linda said no and Shirley maybe realising the truth and trying to help Dean - something like that. That would be more complex and interesting. In fact, my friend's response was that Dean was drunk and starved of love though I reminded her that it didn't excuse or justify what he had done.