|
||||||||
Mr Pinot & Mr Grigio... |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 4,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 38
|
Quote:
qué??
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Leeds
Posts: 15,333
|
That was vicious, it really was!
Was she accusing him of being a boozer or drinking crap wine, therefore a bit of a peasant? |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: In the park with Ben
Posts: 5,528
|
The 'pinot grigio' insult was a different one to the 'go back to his northern chums'. She has an insult ready for every interview clip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 24,438
|
I don't think Pinot Grigio wines are necessarily particularly cheap, though maybe they're not generally right at the top of the wine price range, so I think she was just suggesting that Adam was too fond of the booze.
http://www.sundaytimeswineclub.co.uk...ts_per_page=10 |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 11,878
|
It was a low blow and not justified, but presumably she thought Adam's bringing up her relationship with Paul was also low and not justified. Especially this week, when Sir Alan (and Ghazal) seemed to agree it hadn't affected her performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,425
|
Quote:
It was a low blow and not justified, but presumably she thought Adam's bringing up her relationship with Paul was also low and not justified. Especially this week, when Sir Alan (and Ghazal) seemed to agree it hadn't affected her performance.
MB |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,193
|
Which was the lower blow?
Katie and Paul's relationship did effect their performance. Though none of them liked Adam they all said when Kristina said what Katie had said that Adam liking a drink had never effected his performance. With that and her Northern comments I just want to kick my TV screen in whenever she's on it. Btw her refusing to go and pick up the seeds from Stansted lost them the task. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 11,878
|
Quote:
Katie and Paul's relationship did effect their performance.
Quote:
Btw her refusing to go and pick up the seeds from Stansted lost them the task.
We didn't see the refusal. My impression is that it was just a question, as in "Do you think you can go and make it back in time". They said "We're too far to make it back" and that was that.I don't think any of them understood the rules - if Adam had, he would have either insisted Kate and Kristina go, or else gone himself. As it was, it would have looked like he was giving them an impossible job, which might possibly have got them fired when they failed it. So they very reasonably turned it down. Personally I put this one down to Adam's bad leadership. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:59.


